Applying ethics to itself: Recursive ethical questioning in architecture and second-order cybernetics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This article puts forward a way that ethics may be applied recursively to itself, in the sense that how we speak and reason about ethics is an activity to which ethical considerations and questions apply.

Design/methodology/approach: The article builds on parallels between design and cybernetics, integrating elements of ethical discourse in each field. The way that cybernetics and design can each act as their own meta-discipline, in the design of design and the cybernetics of cybernetics, is used as a pattern for a similarly recursive approach to ethics. This is explored further by drawing parallels between Heinz von Foersters’ criticism of moral codes and concerns about paternalism in designing architecture.

Findings: Designers incorporate implicit ethical questioning as part of the recursive process through which they design their design activity, moving between conversations that pursue the goals of a project and meta-conversations in which they question which goals to pursue and the methods they employ in doing so. Given parallels between designing architecture and setting out an ethics (both of which put forward ways in which others are to live), a similar approach may be taken within ethical discourse, folding ethics within itself as its own meta-discipline.

Originality/value: The article provides a framework in which to address ethical considerations within ethical discourse itself. Recursive ethical questioning of this sort offers a way of coping with the incommensurability of values and goals that is commonplace given the fragmented state of contemporary ethics.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)805-815
Number of pages11
JournalKybernetes
Volume48
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Questioning
Cybernetics
Discourse
Methodology
Commonplaces
Incommensurability
Folding
Originality
Designer
Paternalism
Criticism

Keywords

  • Design
  • Ethics
  • Architecture
  • Second-order cybernetics
  • Recursion

Cite this

@article{902e77536e7c4fa0a555142c8cfaa189,
title = "Applying ethics to itself: Recursive ethical questioning in architecture and second-order cybernetics",
abstract = "Purpose: This article puts forward a way that ethics may be applied recursively to itself, in the sense that how we speak and reason about ethics is an activity to which ethical considerations and questions apply. Design/methodology/approach: The article builds on parallels between design and cybernetics, integrating elements of ethical discourse in each field. The way that cybernetics and design can each act as their own meta-discipline, in the design of design and the cybernetics of cybernetics, is used as a pattern for a similarly recursive approach to ethics. This is explored further by drawing parallels between Heinz von Foersters’ criticism of moral codes and concerns about paternalism in designing architecture. Findings: Designers incorporate implicit ethical questioning as part of the recursive process through which they design their design activity, moving between conversations that pursue the goals of a project and meta-conversations in which they question which goals to pursue and the methods they employ in doing so. Given parallels between designing architecture and setting out an ethics (both of which put forward ways in which others are to live), a similar approach may be taken within ethical discourse, folding ethics within itself as its own meta-discipline. Originality/value: The article provides a framework in which to address ethical considerations within ethical discourse itself. Recursive ethical questioning of this sort offers a way of coping with the incommensurability of values and goals that is commonplace given the fragmented state of contemporary ethics.",
keywords = "Design, Ethics, Architecture, Second-order cybernetics, Recursion",
author = "Ben Sweeting",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/K-12-2017-0471",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "805--815",
journal = "Kybernetes",
issn = "0368-492X",
number = "4",

}

Applying ethics to itself : Recursive ethical questioning in architecture and second-order cybernetics. / Sweeting, Ben.

In: Kybernetes, Vol. 48, No. 4, 01.04.2019, p. 805-815.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applying ethics to itself

T2 - Kybernetes

AU - Sweeting, Ben

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Purpose: This article puts forward a way that ethics may be applied recursively to itself, in the sense that how we speak and reason about ethics is an activity to which ethical considerations and questions apply. Design/methodology/approach: The article builds on parallels between design and cybernetics, integrating elements of ethical discourse in each field. The way that cybernetics and design can each act as their own meta-discipline, in the design of design and the cybernetics of cybernetics, is used as a pattern for a similarly recursive approach to ethics. This is explored further by drawing parallels between Heinz von Foersters’ criticism of moral codes and concerns about paternalism in designing architecture. Findings: Designers incorporate implicit ethical questioning as part of the recursive process through which they design their design activity, moving between conversations that pursue the goals of a project and meta-conversations in which they question which goals to pursue and the methods they employ in doing so. Given parallels between designing architecture and setting out an ethics (both of which put forward ways in which others are to live), a similar approach may be taken within ethical discourse, folding ethics within itself as its own meta-discipline. Originality/value: The article provides a framework in which to address ethical considerations within ethical discourse itself. Recursive ethical questioning of this sort offers a way of coping with the incommensurability of values and goals that is commonplace given the fragmented state of contemporary ethics.

AB - Purpose: This article puts forward a way that ethics may be applied recursively to itself, in the sense that how we speak and reason about ethics is an activity to which ethical considerations and questions apply. Design/methodology/approach: The article builds on parallels between design and cybernetics, integrating elements of ethical discourse in each field. The way that cybernetics and design can each act as their own meta-discipline, in the design of design and the cybernetics of cybernetics, is used as a pattern for a similarly recursive approach to ethics. This is explored further by drawing parallels between Heinz von Foersters’ criticism of moral codes and concerns about paternalism in designing architecture. Findings: Designers incorporate implicit ethical questioning as part of the recursive process through which they design their design activity, moving between conversations that pursue the goals of a project and meta-conversations in which they question which goals to pursue and the methods they employ in doing so. Given parallels between designing architecture and setting out an ethics (both of which put forward ways in which others are to live), a similar approach may be taken within ethical discourse, folding ethics within itself as its own meta-discipline. Originality/value: The article provides a framework in which to address ethical considerations within ethical discourse itself. Recursive ethical questioning of this sort offers a way of coping with the incommensurability of values and goals that is commonplace given the fragmented state of contemporary ethics.

KW - Design

KW - Ethics

KW - Architecture

KW - Second-order cybernetics

KW - Recursion

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053531327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/K-12-2017-0471

DO - 10.1108/K-12-2017-0471

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 805

EP - 815

JO - Kybernetes

JF - Kybernetes

SN - 0368-492X

IS - 4

ER -