Religion: the rhetoric of “not unjust discrimination” towards homosexuals in the Roman Catholic Church

Research output: Contribution to conferenceOtherResearch

Abstract

Objectives This presentation offers an insight on the rationale of “not unjust discrimination” used by the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) to justify the legal discrimination of same-sex partnerships in their official documentation. From a psychological perspective, an analysis of religious discourse on homosexuality is fundamental to detect persisting conditions of social injustice towards LGB people, which impact on their well-being. Design The research is innovative in the academic panorama and consists in an extensive discourse analysis applied to 26 documents of public domain released by the Roman Catholic Church between 1975 and 2015. Method The documents were selected according two main criteria: they are available on the official Vatican website, and they explicitly contain the Holy See position towards homosexuals and same-sex partnerships recognition. The documents selected were systematically analysed using discourse analysis to identify the interpretative repertoires (Potter & Wetherell, 1987; Potter 2012) and the ideologies underpinning the heterosexist arguments (van Dijk, 1993; 2011). Results Three main interpretative repertoires on homosexuality were identified: a serious depravity, a grievous anomaly, and a social threaten. These topoi mutually reinforce and sustain in the RCC discourse against the recognition of same-sex partnerships. Conclusions The interpretative repertoires are deployed in an ongoing ideological discourse aimed at sustaining an alleged superiority of heterosexual marriage over any other form of love. In particular, we will discuss the use of sexual orientation as a salient social category, and its implications for the RCC argument that it is “not unjust discrimination” not allowing equal rights to homosexuals.
Original languageEnglish
Pages0-0
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017
EventBPS Annual Conference Book of abstracts - Brighton, 3-5 May 2017
Duration: 1 Jan 2017 → …

Conference

ConferenceBPS Annual Conference Book of abstracts
Period1/01/17 → …

Fingerprint

Catholic Church (Roman)
homosexuality
rhetoric
discrimination
Religion
discourse analysis
discourse
sexual orientation
Ideologies
documentation
website
love
marriage
well-being

Bibliographical note

This is a pre-publication version of the following article: Zoli, Anna (2017) Religion: the rhetoric of “not unjust discrimination” towards homosexuals in the Roman Catholic Church, BPS Annual Conference, Brighton, 3-5 May 2017

Cite this

@conference{fad30311eee6495599251fe225b478ce,
title = "Religion: the rhetoric of “not unjust discrimination” towards homosexuals in the Roman Catholic Church",
abstract = "Objectives This presentation offers an insight on the rationale of “not unjust discrimination” used by the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) to justify the legal discrimination of same-sex partnerships in their official documentation. From a psychological perspective, an analysis of religious discourse on homosexuality is fundamental to detect persisting conditions of social injustice towards LGB people, which impact on their well-being. Design The research is innovative in the academic panorama and consists in an extensive discourse analysis applied to 26 documents of public domain released by the Roman Catholic Church between 1975 and 2015. Method The documents were selected according two main criteria: they are available on the official Vatican website, and they explicitly contain the Holy See position towards homosexuals and same-sex partnerships recognition. The documents selected were systematically analysed using discourse analysis to identify the interpretative repertoires (Potter & Wetherell, 1987; Potter 2012) and the ideologies underpinning the heterosexist arguments (van Dijk, 1993; 2011). Results Three main interpretative repertoires on homosexuality were identified: a serious depravity, a grievous anomaly, and a social threaten. These topoi mutually reinforce and sustain in the RCC discourse against the recognition of same-sex partnerships. Conclusions The interpretative repertoires are deployed in an ongoing ideological discourse aimed at sustaining an alleged superiority of heterosexual marriage over any other form of love. In particular, we will discuss the use of sexual orientation as a salient social category, and its implications for the RCC argument that it is “not unjust discrimination” not allowing equal rights to homosexuals.",
author = "Anna Zoli",
note = "This is a pre-publication version of the following article: Zoli, Anna (2017) Religion: the rhetoric of “not unjust discrimination” towards homosexuals in the Roman Catholic Church, BPS Annual Conference, Brighton, 3-5 May 2017; BPS Annual Conference Book of abstracts ; Conference date: 01-01-2017",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
pages = "0--0",

}

Religion: the rhetoric of “not unjust discrimination” towards homosexuals in the Roman Catholic Church. / Zoli, Anna.

2017. 0-0 BPS Annual Conference Book of abstracts, .

Research output: Contribution to conferenceOtherResearch

TY - CONF

T1 - Religion: the rhetoric of “not unjust discrimination” towards homosexuals in the Roman Catholic Church

AU - Zoli, Anna

N1 - This is a pre-publication version of the following article: Zoli, Anna (2017) Religion: the rhetoric of “not unjust discrimination” towards homosexuals in the Roman Catholic Church, BPS Annual Conference, Brighton, 3-5 May 2017

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Objectives This presentation offers an insight on the rationale of “not unjust discrimination” used by the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) to justify the legal discrimination of same-sex partnerships in their official documentation. From a psychological perspective, an analysis of religious discourse on homosexuality is fundamental to detect persisting conditions of social injustice towards LGB people, which impact on their well-being. Design The research is innovative in the academic panorama and consists in an extensive discourse analysis applied to 26 documents of public domain released by the Roman Catholic Church between 1975 and 2015. Method The documents were selected according two main criteria: they are available on the official Vatican website, and they explicitly contain the Holy See position towards homosexuals and same-sex partnerships recognition. The documents selected were systematically analysed using discourse analysis to identify the interpretative repertoires (Potter & Wetherell, 1987; Potter 2012) and the ideologies underpinning the heterosexist arguments (van Dijk, 1993; 2011). Results Three main interpretative repertoires on homosexuality were identified: a serious depravity, a grievous anomaly, and a social threaten. These topoi mutually reinforce and sustain in the RCC discourse against the recognition of same-sex partnerships. Conclusions The interpretative repertoires are deployed in an ongoing ideological discourse aimed at sustaining an alleged superiority of heterosexual marriage over any other form of love. In particular, we will discuss the use of sexual orientation as a salient social category, and its implications for the RCC argument that it is “not unjust discrimination” not allowing equal rights to homosexuals.

AB - Objectives This presentation offers an insight on the rationale of “not unjust discrimination” used by the Roman Catholic Church (RCC) to justify the legal discrimination of same-sex partnerships in their official documentation. From a psychological perspective, an analysis of religious discourse on homosexuality is fundamental to detect persisting conditions of social injustice towards LGB people, which impact on their well-being. Design The research is innovative in the academic panorama and consists in an extensive discourse analysis applied to 26 documents of public domain released by the Roman Catholic Church between 1975 and 2015. Method The documents were selected according two main criteria: they are available on the official Vatican website, and they explicitly contain the Holy See position towards homosexuals and same-sex partnerships recognition. The documents selected were systematically analysed using discourse analysis to identify the interpretative repertoires (Potter & Wetherell, 1987; Potter 2012) and the ideologies underpinning the heterosexist arguments (van Dijk, 1993; 2011). Results Three main interpretative repertoires on homosexuality were identified: a serious depravity, a grievous anomaly, and a social threaten. These topoi mutually reinforce and sustain in the RCC discourse against the recognition of same-sex partnerships. Conclusions The interpretative repertoires are deployed in an ongoing ideological discourse aimed at sustaining an alleged superiority of heterosexual marriage over any other form of love. In particular, we will discuss the use of sexual orientation as a salient social category, and its implications for the RCC argument that it is “not unjust discrimination” not allowing equal rights to homosexuals.

M3 - Other

SP - 0

EP - 0

ER -