Western attitudes to war in the Balkans and the shifting meanings of violence, 1912-1991

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article challenges the common scholar presumption since the 1990s that the Balkans have been viewed at least since the 1910s in negative terms, through the lenses of a'frozen' stereotype, as a land of senseless and barbaric violence. Instead of continuity and uniformity, media, scholar and political texts from Britain, France, Germany and the United States show a great variety, from enthusiastic support and active encouragement to the more familiar motifs of shocked horror and condemnation. The key to these varieties was not so much the type of violence that was taking place in the region, but the lenses through which it was viewed. Shifting strategic and national aims, different ideological priorities and clashing cultural stereotypes, were often the key factors deciding whether Balkan violence was seen as 'either a crime against civilization or a crusade on behalf of it'.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)219-239
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Contemporary History
Volume47
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Southeastern Europe
violence
stereotype
crusade
civilization
continuity
offense
France

Cite this

@article{df5657804eae4c468dea0840942b846a,
title = "Western attitudes to war in the Balkans and the shifting meanings of violence, 1912-1991",
abstract = "This article challenges the common scholar presumption since the 1990s that the Balkans have been viewed at least since the 1910s in negative terms, through the lenses of a'frozen' stereotype, as a land of senseless and barbaric violence. Instead of continuity and uniformity, media, scholar and political texts from Britain, France, Germany and the United States show a great variety, from enthusiastic support and active encouragement to the more familiar motifs of shocked horror and condemnation. The key to these varieties was not so much the type of violence that was taking place in the region, but the lenses through which it was viewed. Shifting strategic and national aims, different ideological priorities and clashing cultural stereotypes, were often the key factors deciding whether Balkan violence was seen as 'either a crime against civilization or a crusade on behalf of it'.",
author = "Eugene Michail",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1177/0022009411431714",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "219--239",
journal = "Journal of Contemporary History",
issn = "0022-0094",
number = "2",

}

Western attitudes to war in the Balkans and the shifting meanings of violence, 1912-1991. / Michail, Eugene.

In: Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 47, No. 2, 29.03.2012, p. 219-239.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Western attitudes to war in the Balkans and the shifting meanings of violence, 1912-1991

AU - Michail, Eugene

PY - 2012/3/29

Y1 - 2012/3/29

N2 - This article challenges the common scholar presumption since the 1990s that the Balkans have been viewed at least since the 1910s in negative terms, through the lenses of a'frozen' stereotype, as a land of senseless and barbaric violence. Instead of continuity and uniformity, media, scholar and political texts from Britain, France, Germany and the United States show a great variety, from enthusiastic support and active encouragement to the more familiar motifs of shocked horror and condemnation. The key to these varieties was not so much the type of violence that was taking place in the region, but the lenses through which it was viewed. Shifting strategic and national aims, different ideological priorities and clashing cultural stereotypes, were often the key factors deciding whether Balkan violence was seen as 'either a crime against civilization or a crusade on behalf of it'.

AB - This article challenges the common scholar presumption since the 1990s that the Balkans have been viewed at least since the 1910s in negative terms, through the lenses of a'frozen' stereotype, as a land of senseless and barbaric violence. Instead of continuity and uniformity, media, scholar and political texts from Britain, France, Germany and the United States show a great variety, from enthusiastic support and active encouragement to the more familiar motifs of shocked horror and condemnation. The key to these varieties was not so much the type of violence that was taking place in the region, but the lenses through which it was viewed. Shifting strategic and national aims, different ideological priorities and clashing cultural stereotypes, were often the key factors deciding whether Balkan violence was seen as 'either a crime against civilization or a crusade on behalf of it'.

U2 - 10.1177/0022009411431714

DO - 10.1177/0022009411431714

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 219

EP - 239

JO - Journal of Contemporary History

JF - Journal of Contemporary History

SN - 0022-0094

IS - 2

ER -