Time to revise our dialogue: how flat is the paediatric flatfoot?

Stewart Morrison, Juliet McClymont, Carina Price, Christopher Nester

Research output: Other contributionResearch

Abstract

A recent systematic review of measures of foot development used the medial longitudinal arch profile as its primary indicator of development. A comparative analysis of existing studies was undertaken. This work confirmed changes with arch profile were age-dependent, although the age at which foot development ceased remains unknown. This work also highlighted the abundance of clinical measures used in existing research and outlined the challenges with drawing consensus from available data. There is a clear need to move this debate forward and, to do so, it is essential that scientific and clinical communities unite. It is time to abandon ill-defined measures of foot position, look beyond the medial longitudinal arch as a sole parameter of foot development and re-focus our perspective(s) on the paediatric foot in order to make advances with clinical practice and research.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherBMC
Place of PublicationJournal of Foot and Ankle Research
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

dialogue
time
community

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s). 2017. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Cite this

Morrison, S., McClymont, J., Price, C., & Nester, C. (2017, Nov 21). Time to revise our dialogue: how flat is the paediatric flatfoot? Journal of Foot and Ankle Research: BMC. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-017-0233-2
Morrison, Stewart ; McClymont, Juliet ; Price, Carina ; Nester, Christopher. / Time to revise our dialogue: how flat is the paediatric flatfoot?. 2017. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research : BMC.
@misc{18ed6f24582341aebe79e20d7da3f42e,
title = "Time to revise our dialogue: how flat is the paediatric flatfoot?",
abstract = "A recent systematic review of measures of foot development used the medial longitudinal arch profile as its primary indicator of development. A comparative analysis of existing studies was undertaken. This work confirmed changes with arch profile were age-dependent, although the age at which foot development ceased remains unknown. This work also highlighted the abundance of clinical measures used in existing research and outlined the challenges with drawing consensus from available data. There is a clear need to move this debate forward and, to do so, it is essential that scientific and clinical communities unite. It is time to abandon ill-defined measures of foot position, look beyond the medial longitudinal arch as a sole parameter of foot development and re-focus our perspective(s) on the paediatric foot in order to make advances with clinical practice and research.",
author = "Stewart Morrison and Juliet McClymont and Carina Price and Christopher Nester",
note = "{\circledC} The Author(s). 2017. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1186/s13047-017-0233-2",
language = "English",
publisher = "BMC",
type = "Other",

}

Morrison, S, McClymont, J, Price, C & Nester, C 2017, Time to revise our dialogue: how flat is the paediatric flatfoot?. BMC, Journal of Foot and Ankle Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-017-0233-2

Time to revise our dialogue: how flat is the paediatric flatfoot? / Morrison, Stewart; McClymont, Juliet; Price, Carina; Nester, Christopher.

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research : BMC. 2017, .

Research output: Other contributionResearch

TY - GEN

T1 - Time to revise our dialogue: how flat is the paediatric flatfoot?

AU - Morrison, Stewart

AU - McClymont, Juliet

AU - Price, Carina

AU - Nester, Christopher

N1 - © The Author(s). 2017. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

PY - 2017/11/21

Y1 - 2017/11/21

N2 - A recent systematic review of measures of foot development used the medial longitudinal arch profile as its primary indicator of development. A comparative analysis of existing studies was undertaken. This work confirmed changes with arch profile were age-dependent, although the age at which foot development ceased remains unknown. This work also highlighted the abundance of clinical measures used in existing research and outlined the challenges with drawing consensus from available data. There is a clear need to move this debate forward and, to do so, it is essential that scientific and clinical communities unite. It is time to abandon ill-defined measures of foot position, look beyond the medial longitudinal arch as a sole parameter of foot development and re-focus our perspective(s) on the paediatric foot in order to make advances with clinical practice and research.

AB - A recent systematic review of measures of foot development used the medial longitudinal arch profile as its primary indicator of development. A comparative analysis of existing studies was undertaken. This work confirmed changes with arch profile were age-dependent, although the age at which foot development ceased remains unknown. This work also highlighted the abundance of clinical measures used in existing research and outlined the challenges with drawing consensus from available data. There is a clear need to move this debate forward and, to do so, it is essential that scientific and clinical communities unite. It is time to abandon ill-defined measures of foot position, look beyond the medial longitudinal arch as a sole parameter of foot development and re-focus our perspective(s) on the paediatric foot in order to make advances with clinical practice and research.

U2 - 10.1186/s13047-017-0233-2

DO - 10.1186/s13047-017-0233-2

M3 - Other contribution

PB - BMC

CY - Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

ER -