The role of social capital in participatory arts for wellbeing: Findings from a qualitative systematic review

Norma Daykin, Louise Mansfield, Catherine Meads, Karen Gray, Alex Golding, Alan Tomlinson, Christina Victor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Social capital is often cited as shaping impacts of participatory arts, although the concept has not been systematically mapped in arts, health and wellbeing contexts. In wider health inequalities research, complex, differential, and sometimes negative impacts of social capital have been recognised. Methods: This paper maps of social capital concepts in qualitative research as part of the UK What Works for Wellbeing evidence review programme on culture, sport and wellbeing. Results: Studies often cite positive impacts of bonding and, to a lesser extent, bridging social capital. However, reported challenges suggest the need for a critical approach. Forms of linking social capital, such as reframing and political engagement to address social divisions, are less often cited but may be important in participatory arts and wellbeing. Conclusions: Future research should further specify dimensions of social capital as well as their nuanced effects in arts, and wellbeing contexts.

Keywords

  • Social capital
  • qualitative data analysis
  • music
  • sociology
  • public health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The role of social capital in participatory arts for wellbeing: Findings from a qualitative systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this