Supervisor or counsellor? emotional boundary work in supervision

Ola Strandler, Thomas Johansson, Gina Wisker, Silwa Claesson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose- The aim of this article was to focus on how supervisors relate to and handle the emotional work involved in the supervision process. These emotional issues are related to changes in the academic system, such as an increasing emphasis on efficacy and quality assurance. Design/methodology/approach- Interviews with supervisors are discussed using a theoretical framework built on the concepts of emotional boundary work and feeling rules. A narrative approach was used to make connections between individual stories and the institutional level of the academic system. Findings- The findings show how emotions challenge and condition supervision, and how the micro-processes of supervision and the wider university systems are tightly connected. A paradox is illuminated where emotional aspects are both recognized as an important feature of supervision and as a threat, which could affect it in the context of regulation and increasing demands on efficiency. Practical implications- The findings suggest that a mediating role of supervisors and emotional boundary work needs to be considered in supervision, which demands certain amount of flexibility in regulations. Also, the risks of associating supervision with private issues are acknowledged. Originality/value- The findings suggest that supervision is a highly emotional process, and that supervisors, on the one hand, tend to downplay the emotional side of this process, but on the other hand, are well aware of the complexity of the supervision process and its demands on them. Although supervisor-student interactions have become more regulated, they also include more attention to human interactions, feelings and emotional boundary work.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)70-82
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal for Researcher Development
Volume5
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

Fingerprint

emotional work
counselor
supervision
regulation
university system
interaction
quality assurance
flexibility
emotion
threat
narrative
efficiency

Cite this

Strandler, Ola ; Johansson, Thomas ; Wisker, Gina ; Claesson, Silwa. / Supervisor or counsellor? emotional boundary work in supervision. In: International Journal for Researcher Development. 2014 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 70-82.
@article{620067f5aad14d6b949447fe98363073,
title = "Supervisor or counsellor? emotional boundary work in supervision",
abstract = "Purpose- The aim of this article was to focus on how supervisors relate to and handle the emotional work involved in the supervision process. These emotional issues are related to changes in the academic system, such as an increasing emphasis on efficacy and quality assurance. Design/methodology/approach- Interviews with supervisors are discussed using a theoretical framework built on the concepts of emotional boundary work and feeling rules. A narrative approach was used to make connections between individual stories and the institutional level of the academic system. Findings- The findings show how emotions challenge and condition supervision, and how the micro-processes of supervision and the wider university systems are tightly connected. A paradox is illuminated where emotional aspects are both recognized as an important feature of supervision and as a threat, which could affect it in the context of regulation and increasing demands on efficiency. Practical implications- The findings suggest that a mediating role of supervisors and emotional boundary work needs to be considered in supervision, which demands certain amount of flexibility in regulations. Also, the risks of associating supervision with private issues are acknowledged. Originality/value- The findings suggest that supervision is a highly emotional process, and that supervisors, on the one hand, tend to downplay the emotional side of this process, but on the other hand, are well aware of the complexity of the supervision process and its demands on them. Although supervisor-student interactions have become more regulated, they also include more attention to human interactions, feelings and emotional boundary work.",
author = "Ola Strandler and Thomas Johansson and Gina Wisker and Silwa Claesson",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "70--82",
journal = "International Journal for Researcher Development",
issn = "1759-751X",
number = "2",

}

Supervisor or counsellor? emotional boundary work in supervision. / Strandler, Ola; Johansson, Thomas; Wisker, Gina; Claesson, Silwa.

In: International Journal for Researcher Development, Vol. 5, No. 2, 01.01.2014, p. 70-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Supervisor or counsellor? emotional boundary work in supervision

AU - Strandler, Ola

AU - Johansson, Thomas

AU - Wisker, Gina

AU - Claesson, Silwa

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Purpose- The aim of this article was to focus on how supervisors relate to and handle the emotional work involved in the supervision process. These emotional issues are related to changes in the academic system, such as an increasing emphasis on efficacy and quality assurance. Design/methodology/approach- Interviews with supervisors are discussed using a theoretical framework built on the concepts of emotional boundary work and feeling rules. A narrative approach was used to make connections between individual stories and the institutional level of the academic system. Findings- The findings show how emotions challenge and condition supervision, and how the micro-processes of supervision and the wider university systems are tightly connected. A paradox is illuminated where emotional aspects are both recognized as an important feature of supervision and as a threat, which could affect it in the context of regulation and increasing demands on efficiency. Practical implications- The findings suggest that a mediating role of supervisors and emotional boundary work needs to be considered in supervision, which demands certain amount of flexibility in regulations. Also, the risks of associating supervision with private issues are acknowledged. Originality/value- The findings suggest that supervision is a highly emotional process, and that supervisors, on the one hand, tend to downplay the emotional side of this process, but on the other hand, are well aware of the complexity of the supervision process and its demands on them. Although supervisor-student interactions have become more regulated, they also include more attention to human interactions, feelings and emotional boundary work.

AB - Purpose- The aim of this article was to focus on how supervisors relate to and handle the emotional work involved in the supervision process. These emotional issues are related to changes in the academic system, such as an increasing emphasis on efficacy and quality assurance. Design/methodology/approach- Interviews with supervisors are discussed using a theoretical framework built on the concepts of emotional boundary work and feeling rules. A narrative approach was used to make connections between individual stories and the institutional level of the academic system. Findings- The findings show how emotions challenge and condition supervision, and how the micro-processes of supervision and the wider university systems are tightly connected. A paradox is illuminated where emotional aspects are both recognized as an important feature of supervision and as a threat, which could affect it in the context of regulation and increasing demands on efficiency. Practical implications- The findings suggest that a mediating role of supervisors and emotional boundary work needs to be considered in supervision, which demands certain amount of flexibility in regulations. Also, the risks of associating supervision with private issues are acknowledged. Originality/value- The findings suggest that supervision is a highly emotional process, and that supervisors, on the one hand, tend to downplay the emotional side of this process, but on the other hand, are well aware of the complexity of the supervision process and its demands on them. Although supervisor-student interactions have become more regulated, they also include more attention to human interactions, feelings and emotional boundary work.

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 70

EP - 82

JO - International Journal for Researcher Development

JF - International Journal for Researcher Development

SN - 1759-751X

IS - 2

ER -