Seeing relationships where none exist: A sceptical account of spontaneous ESP and a review of evidence for paranormal believers’ misperception of coincidence

Paul Rogers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Under conditions of uncertainty, people tend to make systematic and predictable errors in their judgements of probability. A number of studies suggest this is especially true of those who believe in the existence of paranormal phenomena, particularly extrasensory perception. The first half of this article outlines how a general misunderstanding of probability can explain why so many people report spontaneous experiences of extrasensory perception (ESP). The second half then reviews empirical evidence for the claim that paranormal believers are more prone to biases in probabilistic reasoning, with particular emphasis placed on believers’ propensity for misjudging co-occurring or ‘conjunctive’ events. Theoretical implications are also discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)195-214
JournalAnomaly: A Journal of Research into the Paranormal
Volume45
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Seeing relationships where none exist: A sceptical account of spontaneous ESP and a review of evidence for paranormal believers’ misperception of coincidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this