Reforming state pension provision in ‘Liberal’ Anglo-Saxon countries: re-commodification, cost-containment or recalibration?

David Lain, Sarah Vickerstaff, Wendy Loretto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There are good theoretical reasons for expecting pension reform in Anglo-Saxon countries to follow similar paths. Esping-Andersen (1990) famously identified these countries as belonging to the same ‘Liberal’ model of welfare, under which benefits, including pensions, are said to be residual and weakly ‘de-commodifying’, reducing individuals’ reliance on the market to a much lesser degree than elsewhere. Pierson (2001) has furthermore argued that because of path dependency welfare states are likely to follow established paths when dealing with ‘permanent austerity’. Following this logic, Aysan and Beaujot (2009) argue that pension reform in liberal countries has resulted in increasing re-commodification. In this paper, we review pension reforms in the UK, USA, Canada and New Zealand in the 2000s. We argue that because, in reality, the pension systems differed significantly at the point of reform, the paths followed varied considerably in terms of whether they focused on ‘re-commodification’, ‘cost-containment’ or ‘recalibration’.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-90
Number of pages14
JournalSocial Policy and Society
Volume12
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2013

Fingerprint

pension reform
cost containment
pension
welfare state
New Zealand
welfare
Canada
reform
market

Bibliographical note

© 2012 Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Keywords

  • Pension Reform
  • Pensions Acts 2007 and 2008
  • Liberal
  • path dependency
  • re-commodification
  • retrenchment

Cite this

@article{44649b15051c4a2c9ff62777dbcb6ff9,
title = "Reforming state pension provision in ‘Liberal’ Anglo-Saxon countries: re-commodification, cost-containment or recalibration?",
abstract = "There are good theoretical reasons for expecting pension reform in Anglo-Saxon countries to follow similar paths. Esping-Andersen (1990) famously identified these countries as belonging to the same ‘Liberal’ model of welfare, under which benefits, including pensions, are said to be residual and weakly ‘de-commodifying’, reducing individuals’ reliance on the market to a much lesser degree than elsewhere. Pierson (2001) has furthermore argued that because of path dependency welfare states are likely to follow established paths when dealing with ‘permanent austerity’. Following this logic, Aysan and Beaujot (2009) argue that pension reform in liberal countries has resulted in increasing re-commodification. In this paper, we review pension reforms in the UK, USA, Canada and New Zealand in the 2000s. We argue that because, in reality, the pension systems differed significantly at the point of reform, the paths followed varied considerably in terms of whether they focused on ‘re-commodification’, ‘cost-containment’ or ‘recalibration’.",
keywords = "Pension Reform, Pensions Acts 2007 and 2008, Liberal, path dependency, re-commodification, retrenchment",
author = "David Lain and Sarah Vickerstaff and Wendy Loretto",
note = "{\circledC} 2012 Cambridge University Press (CUP)",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1474746412000450",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "77--90",
journal = "Social Policy and Society",
issn = "1474-7464",
number = "1",

}

Reforming state pension provision in ‘Liberal’ Anglo-Saxon countries: re-commodification, cost-containment or recalibration? / Lain, David; Vickerstaff, Sarah; Loretto, Wendy.

In: Social Policy and Society, Vol. 12, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 77-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reforming state pension provision in ‘Liberal’ Anglo-Saxon countries: re-commodification, cost-containment or recalibration?

AU - Lain, David

AU - Vickerstaff, Sarah

AU - Loretto, Wendy

N1 - © 2012 Cambridge University Press (CUP)

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - There are good theoretical reasons for expecting pension reform in Anglo-Saxon countries to follow similar paths. Esping-Andersen (1990) famously identified these countries as belonging to the same ‘Liberal’ model of welfare, under which benefits, including pensions, are said to be residual and weakly ‘de-commodifying’, reducing individuals’ reliance on the market to a much lesser degree than elsewhere. Pierson (2001) has furthermore argued that because of path dependency welfare states are likely to follow established paths when dealing with ‘permanent austerity’. Following this logic, Aysan and Beaujot (2009) argue that pension reform in liberal countries has resulted in increasing re-commodification. In this paper, we review pension reforms in the UK, USA, Canada and New Zealand in the 2000s. We argue that because, in reality, the pension systems differed significantly at the point of reform, the paths followed varied considerably in terms of whether they focused on ‘re-commodification’, ‘cost-containment’ or ‘recalibration’.

AB - There are good theoretical reasons for expecting pension reform in Anglo-Saxon countries to follow similar paths. Esping-Andersen (1990) famously identified these countries as belonging to the same ‘Liberal’ model of welfare, under which benefits, including pensions, are said to be residual and weakly ‘de-commodifying’, reducing individuals’ reliance on the market to a much lesser degree than elsewhere. Pierson (2001) has furthermore argued that because of path dependency welfare states are likely to follow established paths when dealing with ‘permanent austerity’. Following this logic, Aysan and Beaujot (2009) argue that pension reform in liberal countries has resulted in increasing re-commodification. In this paper, we review pension reforms in the UK, USA, Canada and New Zealand in the 2000s. We argue that because, in reality, the pension systems differed significantly at the point of reform, the paths followed varied considerably in terms of whether they focused on ‘re-commodification’, ‘cost-containment’ or ‘recalibration’.

KW - Pension Reform

KW - Pensions Acts 2007 and 2008

KW - Liberal

KW - path dependency

KW - re-commodification

KW - retrenchment

U2 - 10.1017/S1474746412000450

DO - 10.1017/S1474746412000450

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 77

EP - 90

JO - Social Policy and Society

JF - Social Policy and Society

SN - 1474-7464

IS - 1

ER -