Background: Growing use of the cluster randomised control trials (RCTs) in healthcare research requires careful attention to study designs, with implications for the development of an evidence-base for practice.Objective: To investigate the characteristics, quality and reporting of cluster-RCTs evaluating occupational therapy interventions to inform future research design.Methods: An extensive search of cluster-RCTs evaluating occupational therapy was conducted in several databases.Results: Fourteen studies met our inclusion criteria; four were protocols. Eleven (79%) justified the use of a cluster-RCT and accounted for clustering in the sample size and analysis. All full studies reported the number of clusters randomised and five reported ICCs (50%): protocols had higher compliance. Risk of bias was most evident in unblinding of participants. Statistician involvement was associated with improved trial quality and reporting.Conclusions: Quality of cluster-RCTs of occupational therapy interventions is comparable to those from other areas of health research and needs improvement.
Bibliographical noteThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
- cluster randomized controlled trials
- occupational therapy
- research design
- systematic review
Tokolahi, E., Hocking, C., Kersten, P., & Vandal, A. C. (2015). Quality and reporting of cluster randomised controlled trials evaluating occupational therapy interventions: A systematic review. Occupation, Participation and Health, 36(1), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1539449215618625