Public vs Private SMEs: A comparison of distress hazard

Jairaj Gupta, Andros Gregoriou, Gbenga Ibikunle

Research output: Working paperResearch

Abstract

This study considers listed and unlisted small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) of the United States separately while developing one-year financial distress prediction model for them. Empirical analysis of financial distress performed using discrete-time duration-dependent hazard rate modelling technique with logit link and a set of financial covariates reveal striking differences between distress hazard of listed and unlisted SMEs. Almost an identical set of covariates exhibit significant discriminatory power for both listed and unlisted SMEs, but there exist significant differences in their weights of regression coefficients in respective groups. Further, Average Marginal Effects of respective covariates for unlisted group of SMEs are strikingly higher than their listed counterparts, suggesting higher vulnerability of unlisted firms due to changes in financial ratios. Our findings support the view that stock exchange listing can relieve SMEs from external financing constraints, thus reducing their likelihood of financial distress.
Original languageEnglish
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Apr 2015

Fingerprint

Public-private
Distress
Hazard
Small and medium-sized enterprises
Covariates
Financial distress
Marginal effects
Exchange listing
Prediction model
Modeling
External financing
Stock exchange
Financial ratios
Logit
Financing constraints
Discrete-time
Coefficients
Empirical analysis
Hazard rate
Vulnerability

Keywords

  • Financial Distress
  • SMEs
  • Discrete Hazard Models
  • Liquidity, Credit Risk

Cite this

@techreport{5f49558fabd44b119d8db6dcbff86964,
title = "Public vs Private SMEs: A comparison of distress hazard",
abstract = "This study considers listed and unlisted small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) of the United States separately while developing one-year financial distress prediction model for them. Empirical analysis of financial distress performed using discrete-time duration-dependent hazard rate modelling technique with logit link and a set of financial covariates reveal striking differences between distress hazard of listed and unlisted SMEs. Almost an identical set of covariates exhibit significant discriminatory power for both listed and unlisted SMEs, but there exist significant differences in their weights of regression coefficients in respective groups. Further, Average Marginal Effects of respective covariates for unlisted group of SMEs are strikingly higher than their listed counterparts, suggesting higher vulnerability of unlisted firms due to changes in financial ratios. Our findings support the view that stock exchange listing can relieve SMEs from external financing constraints, thus reducing their likelihood of financial distress.",
keywords = "Financial Distress, SMEs, Discrete Hazard Models, Liquidity, Credit Risk",
author = "Jairaj Gupta and Andros Gregoriou and Gbenga Ibikunle",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "24",
doi = "http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2594865",
language = "English",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

Public vs Private SMEs: A comparison of distress hazard. / Gupta, Jairaj; Gregoriou, Andros; Ibikunle, Gbenga.

2015.

Research output: Working paperResearch

TY - UNPB

T1 - Public vs Private SMEs: A comparison of distress hazard

AU - Gupta, Jairaj

AU - Gregoriou, Andros

AU - Ibikunle, Gbenga

PY - 2015/4/24

Y1 - 2015/4/24

N2 - This study considers listed and unlisted small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) of the United States separately while developing one-year financial distress prediction model for them. Empirical analysis of financial distress performed using discrete-time duration-dependent hazard rate modelling technique with logit link and a set of financial covariates reveal striking differences between distress hazard of listed and unlisted SMEs. Almost an identical set of covariates exhibit significant discriminatory power for both listed and unlisted SMEs, but there exist significant differences in their weights of regression coefficients in respective groups. Further, Average Marginal Effects of respective covariates for unlisted group of SMEs are strikingly higher than their listed counterparts, suggesting higher vulnerability of unlisted firms due to changes in financial ratios. Our findings support the view that stock exchange listing can relieve SMEs from external financing constraints, thus reducing their likelihood of financial distress.

AB - This study considers listed and unlisted small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) of the United States separately while developing one-year financial distress prediction model for them. Empirical analysis of financial distress performed using discrete-time duration-dependent hazard rate modelling technique with logit link and a set of financial covariates reveal striking differences between distress hazard of listed and unlisted SMEs. Almost an identical set of covariates exhibit significant discriminatory power for both listed and unlisted SMEs, but there exist significant differences in their weights of regression coefficients in respective groups. Further, Average Marginal Effects of respective covariates for unlisted group of SMEs are strikingly higher than their listed counterparts, suggesting higher vulnerability of unlisted firms due to changes in financial ratios. Our findings support the view that stock exchange listing can relieve SMEs from external financing constraints, thus reducing their likelihood of financial distress.

KW - Financial Distress

KW - SMEs

KW - Discrete Hazard Models

KW - Liquidity, Credit Risk

U2 - http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2594865

DO - http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2594865

M3 - Working paper

BT - Public vs Private SMEs: A comparison of distress hazard

ER -