Professional learning: lessons for supervision from doctoral examining

Gina Wisker, Margaret Kiley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Most research into research supervision practice focuses on functional, collegial or problematic power-related experiences. Work developing the supervisory role concentrates on new supervisors, and on taught development and support programmes. Most literature on academics’ professional learning concentrates on learning to be a university teacher and, latterly, a researcher. However, the research supervisor’s role is constantly evolving in response to experiences with a variety of students, and reflection on this can contribute to professional learning. Initial research (Mullins & Kiley, 2002) suggests examiners learn from examining experiences feeding back into supervisory roles. We argue that being a thesis examiner provides academic staff with opportunities to learn about their own supervisory practices, enhancing their professional learning. Our research reports on examiner perceptions of learning from examining doctoral theses, which can be taken back into supervisory practice, and translated into advice for other supervisors and doctoral students.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal For Academic Development
Publication statusPublished - 4 Oct 2012

Fingerprint

supervision
examiner
learning
experience
university teacher
student
staff

Keywords

  • examining
  • doctoral supervision
  • professional learning

Cite this

@article{71e3e639d5d047b7810d031a671a0224,
title = "Professional learning: lessons for supervision from doctoral examining",
abstract = "Most research into research supervision practice focuses on functional, collegial or problematic power-related experiences. Work developing the supervisory role concentrates on new supervisors, and on taught development and support programmes. Most literature on academics’ professional learning concentrates on learning to be a university teacher and, latterly, a researcher. However, the research supervisor’s role is constantly evolving in response to experiences with a variety of students, and reflection on this can contribute to professional learning. Initial research (Mullins & Kiley, 2002) suggests examiners learn from examining experiences feeding back into supervisory roles. We argue that being a thesis examiner provides academic staff with opportunities to learn about their own supervisory practices, enhancing their professional learning. Our research reports on examiner perceptions of learning from examining doctoral theses, which can be taken back into supervisory practice, and translated into advice for other supervisors and doctoral students.",
keywords = "examining, doctoral supervision, professional learning",
author = "Gina Wisker and Margaret Kiley",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "4",
language = "English",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "International Journal For Academic Development",
issn = "1360-144X",

}

Professional learning: lessons for supervision from doctoral examining. / Wisker, Gina; Kiley, Margaret.

In: International Journal For Academic Development, 04.10.2012, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Professional learning: lessons for supervision from doctoral examining

AU - Wisker, Gina

AU - Kiley, Margaret

PY - 2012/10/4

Y1 - 2012/10/4

N2 - Most research into research supervision practice focuses on functional, collegial or problematic power-related experiences. Work developing the supervisory role concentrates on new supervisors, and on taught development and support programmes. Most literature on academics’ professional learning concentrates on learning to be a university teacher and, latterly, a researcher. However, the research supervisor’s role is constantly evolving in response to experiences with a variety of students, and reflection on this can contribute to professional learning. Initial research (Mullins & Kiley, 2002) suggests examiners learn from examining experiences feeding back into supervisory roles. We argue that being a thesis examiner provides academic staff with opportunities to learn about their own supervisory practices, enhancing their professional learning. Our research reports on examiner perceptions of learning from examining doctoral theses, which can be taken back into supervisory practice, and translated into advice for other supervisors and doctoral students.

AB - Most research into research supervision practice focuses on functional, collegial or problematic power-related experiences. Work developing the supervisory role concentrates on new supervisors, and on taught development and support programmes. Most literature on academics’ professional learning concentrates on learning to be a university teacher and, latterly, a researcher. However, the research supervisor’s role is constantly evolving in response to experiences with a variety of students, and reflection on this can contribute to professional learning. Initial research (Mullins & Kiley, 2002) suggests examiners learn from examining experiences feeding back into supervisory roles. We argue that being a thesis examiner provides academic staff with opportunities to learn about their own supervisory practices, enhancing their professional learning. Our research reports on examiner perceptions of learning from examining doctoral theses, which can be taken back into supervisory practice, and translated into advice for other supervisors and doctoral students.

KW - examining

KW - doctoral supervision

KW - professional learning

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - International Journal For Academic Development

JF - International Journal For Academic Development

SN - 1360-144X

ER -