Abstract
The authors correctly highlight the three-dimensional nature of flow in open channels and its important role in channel diversion dynamics. This discussion questions some of the ideas presented by the authors and suggest additional contributory sources for the development of secondary flow at channel divergences.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 87-88 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Journal of Hydraulic Engineering |
| Volume | 121 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 1995 |