On the road with the blood of this kingdom

theology, economy, and blood in The Crying of Lot 49

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Thomas Pynchon’s fiction contains an under-acknowledged interest in blood. In particular, in The Crying of Lot 49 (1966), the ‘play within the play’ The Courier’s Tragedy points toward the necessity of understanding blood when reading the novel, as its plot turns on the inheritance rights of the bloodline. Gil Anidjar’s work on the extent to which the modern concepts of economy and race depend on a theological understanding of blood offers a way to comprehend this insistent if subtle persistence of blood in Pynchon’s work. Concentrating on Lot 49, this article argues that to understand political economy in Pynchon, we first must consider its bloody theological antecedent. I begin by tracing the ways in which the novel signals its understanding of political economy as a secularised iteration of what Anidjar calls the ‘Eucharistic matrix’. I then extend Anidjar’s work into a theory of narrative, arguing that in the failure of Oedipa’s redistributive fantasy at the end of the novel, both she and the text refuse recuperation into the narrative of the nation. In so doing, they side with a radical element of the Tristero, which seeks to establish a relationality that refuses the divisive logic of blood.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)399-414
Number of pages16
JournalTextual Practice
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Kingdom
Theology
Economy
Roads
Blood
Political Economy
Fantasy
Iteration
Logic
Persistence
Relationality
Fiction
Plot
Tragedy
Theory of Narrative

Keywords

  • Anidjar
  • Benedict Anderson
  • Blood
  • Economy
  • Pynchon
  • Road narrative
  • The Crying of Lot 49
  • Theology

Cite this

@article{f20ae94a2e7e4ce485f5e1692fb0c560,
title = "On the road with the blood of this kingdom: theology, economy, and blood in The Crying of Lot 49",
abstract = "Thomas Pynchon’s fiction contains an under-acknowledged interest in blood. In particular, in The Crying of Lot 49 (1966), the ‘play within the play’ The Courier’s Tragedy points toward the necessity of understanding blood when reading the novel, as its plot turns on the inheritance rights of the bloodline. Gil Anidjar’s work on the extent to which the modern concepts of economy and race depend on a theological understanding of blood offers a way to comprehend this insistent if subtle persistence of blood in Pynchon’s work. Concentrating on Lot 49, this article argues that to understand political economy in Pynchon, we first must consider its bloody theological antecedent. I begin by tracing the ways in which the novel signals its understanding of political economy as a secularised iteration of what Anidjar calls the ‘Eucharistic matrix’. I then extend Anidjar’s work into a theory of narrative, arguing that in the failure of Oedipa’s redistributive fantasy at the end of the novel, both she and the text refuse recuperation into the narrative of the nation. In so doing, they side with a radical element of the Tristero, which seeks to establish a relationality that refuses the divisive logic of blood.",
keywords = "Anidjar, Benedict Anderson, Blood, Economy, Pynchon, Road narrative, The Crying of Lot 49, Theology",
author = "Joel Roberts",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1080/0950236X.2019.1580505",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "399--414",
journal = "Textual Practice",
issn = "0950-236X",
number = "3",

}

On the road with the blood of this kingdom : theology, economy, and blood in The Crying of Lot 49. / Roberts, Joel.

In: Textual Practice, Vol. 33, No. 3, 08.04.2019, p. 399-414.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the road with the blood of this kingdom

T2 - theology, economy, and blood in The Crying of Lot 49

AU - Roberts, Joel

PY - 2019/4/8

Y1 - 2019/4/8

N2 - Thomas Pynchon’s fiction contains an under-acknowledged interest in blood. In particular, in The Crying of Lot 49 (1966), the ‘play within the play’ The Courier’s Tragedy points toward the necessity of understanding blood when reading the novel, as its plot turns on the inheritance rights of the bloodline. Gil Anidjar’s work on the extent to which the modern concepts of economy and race depend on a theological understanding of blood offers a way to comprehend this insistent if subtle persistence of blood in Pynchon’s work. Concentrating on Lot 49, this article argues that to understand political economy in Pynchon, we first must consider its bloody theological antecedent. I begin by tracing the ways in which the novel signals its understanding of political economy as a secularised iteration of what Anidjar calls the ‘Eucharistic matrix’. I then extend Anidjar’s work into a theory of narrative, arguing that in the failure of Oedipa’s redistributive fantasy at the end of the novel, both she and the text refuse recuperation into the narrative of the nation. In so doing, they side with a radical element of the Tristero, which seeks to establish a relationality that refuses the divisive logic of blood.

AB - Thomas Pynchon’s fiction contains an under-acknowledged interest in blood. In particular, in The Crying of Lot 49 (1966), the ‘play within the play’ The Courier’s Tragedy points toward the necessity of understanding blood when reading the novel, as its plot turns on the inheritance rights of the bloodline. Gil Anidjar’s work on the extent to which the modern concepts of economy and race depend on a theological understanding of blood offers a way to comprehend this insistent if subtle persistence of blood in Pynchon’s work. Concentrating on Lot 49, this article argues that to understand political economy in Pynchon, we first must consider its bloody theological antecedent. I begin by tracing the ways in which the novel signals its understanding of political economy as a secularised iteration of what Anidjar calls the ‘Eucharistic matrix’. I then extend Anidjar’s work into a theory of narrative, arguing that in the failure of Oedipa’s redistributive fantasy at the end of the novel, both she and the text refuse recuperation into the narrative of the nation. In so doing, they side with a radical element of the Tristero, which seeks to establish a relationality that refuses the divisive logic of blood.

KW - Anidjar

KW - Benedict Anderson

KW - Blood

KW - Economy

KW - Pynchon

KW - Road narrative

KW - The Crying of Lot 49

KW - Theology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064184383&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0950236X.2019.1580505

DO - 10.1080/0950236X.2019.1580505

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 399

EP - 414

JO - Textual Practice

JF - Textual Practice

SN - 0950-236X

IS - 3

ER -