Mobilisable strength design for flexible embedded retaining walls

Maria Diakoumi, William Powrie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Soil–structure interaction may have an important influence on the behaviour of embedded retaining walls, affecting both wall bending moments and ground movements. However, it can be difficult and time consuming to capture in design, especially in a way that gives a physical insight into the key behavioural mechanisms involved. A calculation procedure has been developed for retaining walls propped near the crest that takes into account both the non-linearity of the stress–strain behaviour of the soil and the flexibility of the wall. Results for different pore water pressure conditions, soil strengths and soil and wall stiffnesses are presented in the form of look-up charts, and are compared with those derived from factored limit equilibrium analyses. A dimensionless parameter is introduced to represent the relative soil–wall stiffness, and its importance is demonstrated. A critical flexibility ratio is identified at which the bending moments start to reduce below those given by a conventional limit equilibrium calculation. This ratio is linked to the wall deflection, and is used to distinguish a stiff from a flexible system in soils of different strengths and pore water pressure conditions. The approach is discussed in relation to previous studies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)95-106
Number of pages11
JournalGéotechnique
Volume63
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint

retaining wall
stiffness
porewater
ground movement
soil
soil strength
deflection
nonlinearity
calculation

Cite this

Diakoumi, Maria ; Powrie, William. / Mobilisable strength design for flexible embedded retaining walls. In: Géotechnique. 2013 ; Vol. 63, No. 2. pp. 95-106.
@article{e86c3d687c034764aebd669948548981,
title = "Mobilisable strength design for flexible embedded retaining walls",
abstract = "Soil–structure interaction may have an important influence on the behaviour of embedded retaining walls, affecting both wall bending moments and ground movements. However, it can be difficult and time consuming to capture in design, especially in a way that gives a physical insight into the key behavioural mechanisms involved. A calculation procedure has been developed for retaining walls propped near the crest that takes into account both the non-linearity of the stress–strain behaviour of the soil and the flexibility of the wall. Results for different pore water pressure conditions, soil strengths and soil and wall stiffnesses are presented in the form of look-up charts, and are compared with those derived from factored limit equilibrium analyses. A dimensionless parameter is introduced to represent the relative soil–wall stiffness, and its importance is demonstrated. A critical flexibility ratio is identified at which the bending moments start to reduce below those given by a conventional limit equilibrium calculation. This ratio is linked to the wall deflection, and is used to distinguish a stiff from a flexible system in soils of different strengths and pore water pressure conditions. The approach is discussed in relation to previous studies.",
author = "Maria Diakoumi and William Powrie",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1680/geot.11.P.044",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "95--106",
journal = "G{\'e}otechnique",
issn = "0016-8505",
number = "2",

}

Mobilisable strength design for flexible embedded retaining walls. / Diakoumi, Maria; Powrie, William.

In: Géotechnique, Vol. 63, No. 2, 02.2013, p. 95-106.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mobilisable strength design for flexible embedded retaining walls

AU - Diakoumi, Maria

AU - Powrie, William

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - Soil–structure interaction may have an important influence on the behaviour of embedded retaining walls, affecting both wall bending moments and ground movements. However, it can be difficult and time consuming to capture in design, especially in a way that gives a physical insight into the key behavioural mechanisms involved. A calculation procedure has been developed for retaining walls propped near the crest that takes into account both the non-linearity of the stress–strain behaviour of the soil and the flexibility of the wall. Results for different pore water pressure conditions, soil strengths and soil and wall stiffnesses are presented in the form of look-up charts, and are compared with those derived from factored limit equilibrium analyses. A dimensionless parameter is introduced to represent the relative soil–wall stiffness, and its importance is demonstrated. A critical flexibility ratio is identified at which the bending moments start to reduce below those given by a conventional limit equilibrium calculation. This ratio is linked to the wall deflection, and is used to distinguish a stiff from a flexible system in soils of different strengths and pore water pressure conditions. The approach is discussed in relation to previous studies.

AB - Soil–structure interaction may have an important influence on the behaviour of embedded retaining walls, affecting both wall bending moments and ground movements. However, it can be difficult and time consuming to capture in design, especially in a way that gives a physical insight into the key behavioural mechanisms involved. A calculation procedure has been developed for retaining walls propped near the crest that takes into account both the non-linearity of the stress–strain behaviour of the soil and the flexibility of the wall. Results for different pore water pressure conditions, soil strengths and soil and wall stiffnesses are presented in the form of look-up charts, and are compared with those derived from factored limit equilibrium analyses. A dimensionless parameter is introduced to represent the relative soil–wall stiffness, and its importance is demonstrated. A critical flexibility ratio is identified at which the bending moments start to reduce below those given by a conventional limit equilibrium calculation. This ratio is linked to the wall deflection, and is used to distinguish a stiff from a flexible system in soils of different strengths and pore water pressure conditions. The approach is discussed in relation to previous studies.

U2 - 10.1680/geot.11.P.044

DO - 10.1680/geot.11.P.044

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 95

EP - 106

JO - Géotechnique

T2 - Géotechnique

JF - Géotechnique

SN - 0016-8505

IS - 2

ER -