Language, economic and gender disparities widen the scientific productivity gap

Tatsuya Amano, Valeria Ramírez-Castañeda, Violeta Berdejo-Espinola, Israel Borokini, Shawan Chowdhury, Marina Golivets, Juan David González-Trujillo, Flavia Montaño-Centellas, Kumar Paudel, Rachel L. White, Diogo Veríssimo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Scientific communities need to understand and eliminate barriers that prevent people with diverse backgrounds from contributing to and participating in science. However, the combined impact of individuals’ linguistic, economic, and gender backgrounds on their scientific productivity is poorly understood. Using a survey of 908 environmental scientists, we show that being a woman is associated with up to a 45% reduction in the number of English-language publications, compared to men. Being a woman, a non-native English speaker, and from a low-income country is associated with up to a 70% reduction, compared to male native English speakers from a high-income country. The linguistic and economic productivity gap narrows when based on the total number of English- and non-English-language publications. We call for an explicit effort to consider linguistic, economic, and gender backgrounds and incorporate non-English-language publications when assessing the performance and contribution of scientists.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages13
JournalPLOS Biology
Volume23
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Sept 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright: © 2025 Amano et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Keywords

  • Efficiency
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Language
  • Male
  • Publications - statistics & numerical data
  • Science
  • Sex Factors
  • Sexism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Language, economic and gender disparities widen the scientific productivity gap'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this