Here and there: an artist's writing as aesthetic form

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Developing the recent interest in ‘art-writing’, this one-act play explores one aspect of that area: specifically, an artist’s writing. The monologue adapts Mieke Bal’s notion of art history, written from the place of its objects, to invoke the idea of an artist’s writing as writing by and as an artist. Contending that this is writing as aesthetic form, the play’s ‘Speaker’ proposes that an artist’s writing is distinct from other forms of discourse about art precisely by virtue of its aesthetic dimension. The speaker defines ‘aesthetic’ via Hegel’s notion of the arts as a symbolic discourse in which the signifier is visible, and ‘motivated’ by its signified. In a Hegelian scheme, this makes the arts inferior, and hence makes the task of defending aesthetic writing, which takes up the rest of this drama, all the more urgent. The case is made with reference to pedagogic pragmatics, cultural politics, ethics and therapeutics: Barthes’ ‘pleasure of the text’ – with which the text concludes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-109
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Writing in Creative Practice
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010

Fingerprint

Aesthetics
Artist
Art
Discourse
Aesthetic Dimension
Art History
Therapeutics
Cultural Politics
Drama
Signifier
Roland Barthes
Monologue
Pleasure
Visible
Georg W.F. Hegel

Cite this

@article{cdfac261b1614170bc6e8670de3fc8ab,
title = "Here and there: an artist's writing as aesthetic form",
abstract = "Developing the recent interest in ‘art-writing’, this one-act play explores one aspect of that area: specifically, an artist’s writing. The monologue adapts Mieke Bal’s notion of art history, written from the place of its objects, to invoke the idea of an artist’s writing as writing by and as an artist. Contending that this is writing as aesthetic form, the play’s ‘Speaker’ proposes that an artist’s writing is distinct from other forms of discourse about art precisely by virtue of its aesthetic dimension. The speaker defines ‘aesthetic’ via Hegel’s notion of the arts as a symbolic discourse in which the signifier is visible, and ‘motivated’ by its signified. In a Hegelian scheme, this makes the arts inferior, and hence makes the task of defending aesthetic writing, which takes up the rest of this drama, all the more urgent. The case is made with reference to pedagogic pragmatics, cultural politics, ethics and therapeutics: Barthes’ ‘pleasure of the text’ – with which the text concludes.",
author = "Francis, {Mary Anne}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1386/jwcp.3.2.97_1",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "97--109",
journal = "Journal of Writing in Creative Practice",
issn = "1753-5190",
number = "2",

}

Here and there: an artist's writing as aesthetic form. / Francis, Mary Anne.

In: Journal of Writing in Creative Practice, Vol. 3, No. 2, 12.2010, p. 97-109.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Here and there: an artist's writing as aesthetic form

AU - Francis, Mary Anne

PY - 2010/12

Y1 - 2010/12

N2 - Developing the recent interest in ‘art-writing’, this one-act play explores one aspect of that area: specifically, an artist’s writing. The monologue adapts Mieke Bal’s notion of art history, written from the place of its objects, to invoke the idea of an artist’s writing as writing by and as an artist. Contending that this is writing as aesthetic form, the play’s ‘Speaker’ proposes that an artist’s writing is distinct from other forms of discourse about art precisely by virtue of its aesthetic dimension. The speaker defines ‘aesthetic’ via Hegel’s notion of the arts as a symbolic discourse in which the signifier is visible, and ‘motivated’ by its signified. In a Hegelian scheme, this makes the arts inferior, and hence makes the task of defending aesthetic writing, which takes up the rest of this drama, all the more urgent. The case is made with reference to pedagogic pragmatics, cultural politics, ethics and therapeutics: Barthes’ ‘pleasure of the text’ – with which the text concludes.

AB - Developing the recent interest in ‘art-writing’, this one-act play explores one aspect of that area: specifically, an artist’s writing. The monologue adapts Mieke Bal’s notion of art history, written from the place of its objects, to invoke the idea of an artist’s writing as writing by and as an artist. Contending that this is writing as aesthetic form, the play’s ‘Speaker’ proposes that an artist’s writing is distinct from other forms of discourse about art precisely by virtue of its aesthetic dimension. The speaker defines ‘aesthetic’ via Hegel’s notion of the arts as a symbolic discourse in which the signifier is visible, and ‘motivated’ by its signified. In a Hegelian scheme, this makes the arts inferior, and hence makes the task of defending aesthetic writing, which takes up the rest of this drama, all the more urgent. The case is made with reference to pedagogic pragmatics, cultural politics, ethics and therapeutics: Barthes’ ‘pleasure of the text’ – with which the text concludes.

U2 - 10.1386/jwcp.3.2.97_1

DO - 10.1386/jwcp.3.2.97_1

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 97

EP - 109

JO - Journal of Writing in Creative Practice

JF - Journal of Writing in Creative Practice

SN - 1753-5190

IS - 2

ER -