Governance of Technology in the Electronics Industries of East and South-East Asia

Michael Hobday, Alan Cawson, S. Ran Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper develops a taxonomy of government–firm relations in the electronics industries of four countries within East Asia. The paper analyses the strategies, behaviours and functions of firms (local and foreign), suggesting that the effectiveness of direct government–firm interventions may be overstated in the policy literature. By focusing on electronics, the largest export sector, the paper makes inter-country comparisons between government policy approaches, corporate strategies, technological trends, product specialisations, and the effectiveness of government-funded technology institutes and government–firm partnerships for technology. Firm-level case findings are used to provide a detailed understanding of emerging East Asian corporate strategies and technological strengths and weaknesses. The paper confirms the remarkable degree of technological progress over the past three decades but warns against simple extrapolations into the future. By examining strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, the paper touches on issues raised by the economic crisis in East Asia, supporting the view that the primary role of government is to secure macroeconomic stability, rather than to intervene in support of specific firms or sectors. The empirical evidence is used to assess and extend conceptualisations of the East Asian developmental state, arguing that the conventional market to state continuum fails to capture important features of the region's development. The paper also comments on the relevance of the findings for modern resource-based theories of the firm and neo-Schumpeterian models of innovation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)209-226
Number of pages18
JournalTechnovation
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2001

Fingerprint

South-East Asia
Governance
Electronics industry
Corporate strategy
Asia
East Asia
Joseph Schumpeter
Role of government
Extrapolation
Government policy
Technological progress
Economic crisis
Threat
Theory of the firm
Macroeconomic stability
Empirical evidence
Conceptualization
Resource-based theory
Taxonomy
Developmental state

Keywords

  • Electronics industry
  • East Asia
  • CENTRIM

Cite this

Hobday, Michael ; Cawson, Alan ; Kim, S. Ran. / Governance of Technology in the Electronics Industries of East and South-East Asia. In: Technovation. 2001 ; Vol. 21, No. 4. pp. 209-226.
@article{9d3920c0105b4dc9ab1b94ac266e60ca,
title = "Governance of Technology in the Electronics Industries of East and South-East Asia",
abstract = "This paper develops a taxonomy of government–firm relations in the electronics industries of four countries within East Asia. The paper analyses the strategies, behaviours and functions of firms (local and foreign), suggesting that the effectiveness of direct government–firm interventions may be overstated in the policy literature. By focusing on electronics, the largest export sector, the paper makes inter-country comparisons between government policy approaches, corporate strategies, technological trends, product specialisations, and the effectiveness of government-funded technology institutes and government–firm partnerships for technology. Firm-level case findings are used to provide a detailed understanding of emerging East Asian corporate strategies and technological strengths and weaknesses. The paper confirms the remarkable degree of technological progress over the past three decades but warns against simple extrapolations into the future. By examining strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, the paper touches on issues raised by the economic crisis in East Asia, supporting the view that the primary role of government is to secure macroeconomic stability, rather than to intervene in support of specific firms or sectors. The empirical evidence is used to assess and extend conceptualisations of the East Asian developmental state, arguing that the conventional market to state continuum fails to capture important features of the region's development. The paper also comments on the relevance of the findings for modern resource-based theories of the firm and neo-Schumpeterian models of innovation.",
keywords = "Electronics industry, East Asia, CENTRIM",
author = "Michael Hobday and Alan Cawson and Kim, {S. Ran}",
year = "2001",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00038-9",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "209--226",
journal = "Technovation",
issn = "0166-4972",
number = "4",

}

Governance of Technology in the Electronics Industries of East and South-East Asia. / Hobday, Michael; Cawson, Alan; Kim, S. Ran.

In: Technovation, Vol. 21, No. 4, 04.2001, p. 209-226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Governance of Technology in the Electronics Industries of East and South-East Asia

AU - Hobday, Michael

AU - Cawson, Alan

AU - Kim, S. Ran

PY - 2001/4

Y1 - 2001/4

N2 - This paper develops a taxonomy of government–firm relations in the electronics industries of four countries within East Asia. The paper analyses the strategies, behaviours and functions of firms (local and foreign), suggesting that the effectiveness of direct government–firm interventions may be overstated in the policy literature. By focusing on electronics, the largest export sector, the paper makes inter-country comparisons between government policy approaches, corporate strategies, technological trends, product specialisations, and the effectiveness of government-funded technology institutes and government–firm partnerships for technology. Firm-level case findings are used to provide a detailed understanding of emerging East Asian corporate strategies and technological strengths and weaknesses. The paper confirms the remarkable degree of technological progress over the past three decades but warns against simple extrapolations into the future. By examining strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, the paper touches on issues raised by the economic crisis in East Asia, supporting the view that the primary role of government is to secure macroeconomic stability, rather than to intervene in support of specific firms or sectors. The empirical evidence is used to assess and extend conceptualisations of the East Asian developmental state, arguing that the conventional market to state continuum fails to capture important features of the region's development. The paper also comments on the relevance of the findings for modern resource-based theories of the firm and neo-Schumpeterian models of innovation.

AB - This paper develops a taxonomy of government–firm relations in the electronics industries of four countries within East Asia. The paper analyses the strategies, behaviours and functions of firms (local and foreign), suggesting that the effectiveness of direct government–firm interventions may be overstated in the policy literature. By focusing on electronics, the largest export sector, the paper makes inter-country comparisons between government policy approaches, corporate strategies, technological trends, product specialisations, and the effectiveness of government-funded technology institutes and government–firm partnerships for technology. Firm-level case findings are used to provide a detailed understanding of emerging East Asian corporate strategies and technological strengths and weaknesses. The paper confirms the remarkable degree of technological progress over the past three decades but warns against simple extrapolations into the future. By examining strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, the paper touches on issues raised by the economic crisis in East Asia, supporting the view that the primary role of government is to secure macroeconomic stability, rather than to intervene in support of specific firms or sectors. The empirical evidence is used to assess and extend conceptualisations of the East Asian developmental state, arguing that the conventional market to state continuum fails to capture important features of the region's development. The paper also comments on the relevance of the findings for modern resource-based theories of the firm and neo-Schumpeterian models of innovation.

KW - Electronics industry

KW - East Asia

KW - CENTRIM

U2 - 10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00038-9

DO - 10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00038-9

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 209

EP - 226

JO - Technovation

JF - Technovation

SN - 0166-4972

IS - 4

ER -