Further Reading Required

Tilo Amhoff, Nicholas Beech, Katie Lloyd Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Further Reading Required was the eighth Architecture & Seminar held termly at the Bartlett School of Architecture providing opportunities for staff and student researchers within the school to initiate research conversations at interdisciplinary crossings. The one day symposium opened a discussion about why we might turn to building specifications, contracts, and technical literature with researchers in architectural history and theory, building construction, law, and literature, and with architectural practitioners interested in the effects of working within this framework and in finding openings for its subversion. Further Reading Required asked how we understand the meaning and value of these documents and what approaches we might take in reading them. What social, material, and discursive histories are made available through these documents? How might we read them not merely for themselves or only for their technical contents, but as historical documents of specific processes, the specification of labour and materials, particular social and material relations, technological developments, or concepts of material and matter? A further key premise for the event was that these legal documents have a constitutive role in the production of architecture, and that they can no more be understood simply as neutral aids to building than as straightjackets and limitations to design. The debate about BIM demonstrated not only the timeliness of our discussions, but also the degree to which the kinds of documents and contractual arrangements employed in making buildings – and the precise form they take – can shape architectural practice and what is, and what can be, built.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)197-199
Number of pages3
Journalarq: Architectural Research Quarterly
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2012

Fingerprint

construction law
building
technical literature
subversion
history
technical development
school
conversation
labor
staff
event
Values
student
literature

Cite this

Amhoff, Tilo ; Beech, Nicholas ; Lloyd Thomas, Katie. / Further Reading Required. In: arq: Architectural Research Quarterly. 2012 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 197-199.
@article{5044e8d4977b401886eba96483700b16,
title = "Further Reading Required",
abstract = "Further Reading Required was the eighth Architecture & Seminar held termly at the Bartlett School of Architecture providing opportunities for staff and student researchers within the school to initiate research conversations at interdisciplinary crossings. The one day symposium opened a discussion about why we might turn to building specifications, contracts, and technical literature with researchers in architectural history and theory, building construction, law, and literature, and with architectural practitioners interested in the effects of working within this framework and in finding openings for its subversion. Further Reading Required asked how we understand the meaning and value of these documents and what approaches we might take in reading them. What social, material, and discursive histories are made available through these documents? How might we read them not merely for themselves or only for their technical contents, but as historical documents of specific processes, the specification of labour and materials, particular social and material relations, technological developments, or concepts of material and matter? A further key premise for the event was that these legal documents have a constitutive role in the production of architecture, and that they can no more be understood simply as neutral aids to building than as straightjackets and limitations to design. The debate about BIM demonstrated not only the timeliness of our discussions, but also the degree to which the kinds of documents and contractual arrangements employed in making buildings – and the precise form they take – can shape architectural practice and what is, and what can be, built.",
author = "Tilo Amhoff and Nicholas Beech and {Lloyd Thomas}, Katie",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S135913551300002X",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "197--199",
journal = "arq: Architectural Research Quarterly",
issn = "1359-1355",
number = "3",

}

Further Reading Required. / Amhoff, Tilo; Beech, Nicholas; Lloyd Thomas, Katie.

In: arq: Architectural Research Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 3, 01.09.2012, p. 197-199.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Further Reading Required

AU - Amhoff, Tilo

AU - Beech, Nicholas

AU - Lloyd Thomas, Katie

PY - 2012/9/1

Y1 - 2012/9/1

N2 - Further Reading Required was the eighth Architecture & Seminar held termly at the Bartlett School of Architecture providing opportunities for staff and student researchers within the school to initiate research conversations at interdisciplinary crossings. The one day symposium opened a discussion about why we might turn to building specifications, contracts, and technical literature with researchers in architectural history and theory, building construction, law, and literature, and with architectural practitioners interested in the effects of working within this framework and in finding openings for its subversion. Further Reading Required asked how we understand the meaning and value of these documents and what approaches we might take in reading them. What social, material, and discursive histories are made available through these documents? How might we read them not merely for themselves or only for their technical contents, but as historical documents of specific processes, the specification of labour and materials, particular social and material relations, technological developments, or concepts of material and matter? A further key premise for the event was that these legal documents have a constitutive role in the production of architecture, and that they can no more be understood simply as neutral aids to building than as straightjackets and limitations to design. The debate about BIM demonstrated not only the timeliness of our discussions, but also the degree to which the kinds of documents and contractual arrangements employed in making buildings – and the precise form they take – can shape architectural practice and what is, and what can be, built.

AB - Further Reading Required was the eighth Architecture & Seminar held termly at the Bartlett School of Architecture providing opportunities for staff and student researchers within the school to initiate research conversations at interdisciplinary crossings. The one day symposium opened a discussion about why we might turn to building specifications, contracts, and technical literature with researchers in architectural history and theory, building construction, law, and literature, and with architectural practitioners interested in the effects of working within this framework and in finding openings for its subversion. Further Reading Required asked how we understand the meaning and value of these documents and what approaches we might take in reading them. What social, material, and discursive histories are made available through these documents? How might we read them not merely for themselves or only for their technical contents, but as historical documents of specific processes, the specification of labour and materials, particular social and material relations, technological developments, or concepts of material and matter? A further key premise for the event was that these legal documents have a constitutive role in the production of architecture, and that they can no more be understood simply as neutral aids to building than as straightjackets and limitations to design. The debate about BIM demonstrated not only the timeliness of our discussions, but also the degree to which the kinds of documents and contractual arrangements employed in making buildings – and the precise form they take – can shape architectural practice and what is, and what can be, built.

U2 - 10.1017/S135913551300002X

DO - 10.1017/S135913551300002X

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 197

EP - 199

JO - arq: Architectural Research Quarterly

JF - arq: Architectural Research Quarterly

SN - 1359-1355

IS - 3

ER -