Fallacies in the Stakeholding Debate

Lawrence Haar

doi:10.1111/1468-0270.00191

Fallacies in the Stakeholding Debate

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This paper reviews the logic underlying the fashionable stakeholding literature and finds it at variance with received economic theory. It concludes that many stakeholding views are flawed, particularly in regard to the role of profit which is seen as a constraint rather than an objective.

Original language	English
Article number	8
Pages (from-to)	70
Number of pages	75
Journal	Economic Affairs
Volume	19
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0270.00191
Publication status	Published - 1 Dec 1999

Keywords

Stakeholding
Anglo-Saxon
Profits

Access to Document

10.1111/1468-0270.00191Licence: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{4f2713afe12c4219aa7d856183410fe8,

title = "Fallacies in the Stakeholding Debate",

abstract = "This paper reviews the logic underlying the fashionable stakeholding literature and finds it at variance with received economic theory. It concludes that many stakeholding views are flawed, particularly in regard to the role of profit which is seen as a constraint rather than an objective.",

keywords = "Stakeholding, Anglo-Saxon, Profits",

author = "Lawrence Haar",

year = "1999",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/1468-0270.00191",

language = "English",

volume = "19",

pages = "70",

journal = "Economic Affairs",

issn = "0265-0665",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fallacies in the Stakeholding Debate

AU - Haar, Lawrence

PY - 1999/12/1

Y1 - 1999/12/1

N2 - This paper reviews the logic underlying the fashionable stakeholding literature and finds it at variance with received economic theory. It concludes that many stakeholding views are flawed, particularly in regard to the role of profit which is seen as a constraint rather than an objective.

AB - This paper reviews the logic underlying the fashionable stakeholding literature and finds it at variance with received economic theory. It concludes that many stakeholding views are flawed, particularly in regard to the role of profit which is seen as a constraint rather than an objective.

KW - Stakeholding

KW - Anglo-Saxon

KW - Profits

UR - https://www.deepdyve.com/lp/wiley/fallacies-in-the-stakeholding-debate-2DT85FoMf0

U2 - 10.1111/1468-0270.00191

DO - 10.1111/1468-0270.00191

M3 - Article

SN - 0265-0665

VL - 19

SP - 70

JO - Economic Affairs

JF - Economic Affairs

IS - 4

M1 - 8

ER -

Fallacies in the Stakeholding Debate

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this