Computerised Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Common Mental Health Disorders, What Works, for Whom Under What Circumstances? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Rebecca Grist, Kate Cavanagh

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Abstract This systematic review and meta-analysis
    evaluates the effectiveness of computerised cognitive
    behavioural therapy (CCBT) as a low intensity intervention
    for common mental health disorders (CMHD), and investigates
    some potential moderators of these effects. A metaanalysis
    was conducted on 49 randomised controlled trials
    comparing CCBT to other therapies (n = 24) and waiting
    list controls (n = 25), across the range of CMHD. Results
    indicated an overall mean effect size of g = 0.77 (95 % CI
    0.59–0.95) in favour of the CCBT trial arms. CCBT was
    found to be significantly more effective than both waitlist
    and active control conditions. The mean age of study
    sample and type of control group both significantly moderated
    this effect. No further measured variables, including
    guidance were found to moderate this effect. These findings
    indicate that CCBT can be an effective low-intensity
    intervention for CMHD and support the implementation of
    CCBT within the stepped-care context. Limitations of this
    review, and implications for theory, research and practice
    are discussed.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)243-251
    JournalJournal of Contemporary Psychotherapy
    Volume43
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 4 Sept 2013

    Keywords

    • Computerised cognitive behavioural therapy
    • Anxiety
    • Depression
    • E-mental health
    • common mental health disorders
    • meta analysis
    • Systematic Review

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Computerised Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Common Mental Health Disorders, What Works, for Whom Under What Circumstances? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this