Youth Crime: Whose Responsibility?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Responsibility is an increasingly important concept within both political and academic debates about youth justice. As an alternative approach to youth crime, restorative justice ideology has contributed to this debate. Restorative justice emphasizes the importance of repairing harm by encouraging offenders to address past behaviour and to become responsible for future actions. This article reflects on empirical findings from the author's research with 41 young offenders who were the subjects of Referral Orders, a purportedly restorative disposal. It considers how successfully the English youth justice system has adopted this approach, arguing that there is a significant differ- ence between the theory of restorative justice and its use in practice. To some extent, New Labour's emphasis on the criminal justice system has missed the point behind the ideology of restorative justice and the wider opportunities it offers for a proactively restorative society.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-149
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Law and Society
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2008

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Youth Crime: Whose Responsibility?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this