Youth Crime: Whose Responsibility?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Responsibility is an increasingly important concept within both political and academic debates about youth justice. As an alternative approach to youth crime, restorative justice ideology has contributed to this debate. Restorative justice emphasizes the importance of repairing harm by encouraging offenders to address past behaviour and to become responsible for future actions. This article reflects on empirical findings from the author's research with 41 young offenders who were the subjects of Referral Orders, a purportedly restorative disposal. It considers how successfully the English youth justice system has adopted this approach, arguing that there is a significant differ- ence between the theory of restorative justice and its use in practice. To some extent, New Labour's emphasis on the criminal justice system has missed the point behind the ideology of restorative justice and the wider opportunities it offers for a proactively restorative society.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-149
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Law and Society
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2008

Fingerprint

justice
offense
responsibility
offender
ideology
New Labour

Cite this

@article{19e49537b45a4051bbd3564b2c4b39b5,
title = "Youth Crime: Whose Responsibility?",
abstract = "Responsibility is an increasingly important concept within both political and academic debates about youth justice. As an alternative approach to youth crime, restorative justice ideology has contributed to this debate. Restorative justice emphasizes the importance of repairing harm by encouraging offenders to address past behaviour and to become responsible for future actions. This article reflects on empirical findings from the author's research with 41 young offenders who were the subjects of Referral Orders, a purportedly restorative disposal. It considers how successfully the English youth justice system has adopted this approach, arguing that there is a significant differ- ence between the theory of restorative justice and its use in practice. To some extent, New Labour's emphasis on the criminal justice system has missed the point behind the ideology of restorative justice and the wider opportunities it offers for a proactively restorative society.",
author = "Alexandra Newbury",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-6478.2008.00418",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "131--149",
journal = "Journal of Law and Society",
issn = "0263-323X",
number = "1",

}

Youth Crime: Whose Responsibility? / Newbury, Alexandra.

In: Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 35, No. 1, 01.03.2008, p. 131-149.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Youth Crime: Whose Responsibility?

AU - Newbury, Alexandra

PY - 2008/3/1

Y1 - 2008/3/1

N2 - Responsibility is an increasingly important concept within both political and academic debates about youth justice. As an alternative approach to youth crime, restorative justice ideology has contributed to this debate. Restorative justice emphasizes the importance of repairing harm by encouraging offenders to address past behaviour and to become responsible for future actions. This article reflects on empirical findings from the author's research with 41 young offenders who were the subjects of Referral Orders, a purportedly restorative disposal. It considers how successfully the English youth justice system has adopted this approach, arguing that there is a significant differ- ence between the theory of restorative justice and its use in practice. To some extent, New Labour's emphasis on the criminal justice system has missed the point behind the ideology of restorative justice and the wider opportunities it offers for a proactively restorative society.

AB - Responsibility is an increasingly important concept within both political and academic debates about youth justice. As an alternative approach to youth crime, restorative justice ideology has contributed to this debate. Restorative justice emphasizes the importance of repairing harm by encouraging offenders to address past behaviour and to become responsible for future actions. This article reflects on empirical findings from the author's research with 41 young offenders who were the subjects of Referral Orders, a purportedly restorative disposal. It considers how successfully the English youth justice system has adopted this approach, arguing that there is a significant differ- ence between the theory of restorative justice and its use in practice. To some extent, New Labour's emphasis on the criminal justice system has missed the point behind the ideology of restorative justice and the wider opportunities it offers for a proactively restorative society.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2008.00418

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2008.00418

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 131

EP - 149

JO - Journal of Law and Society

JF - Journal of Law and Society

SN - 0263-323X

IS - 1

ER -