Abstract
Most grammarians refuse to treat will as a marker of future tense in English. We examine the arguments against treating will as a tense and find them weak; the arguments in favour of treating it as a modal also turn out to be poor. We argue that will should be treated as a marker of future tense, and that its so-called modal uses are either not modal or have independent explanations. The one exception is the volitional use of will: to account for this, we propose that willingness is a semantic relic from an earlier meaning of the word.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 187-215 |
Number of pages | 29 |
Journal | English Language & Linguistics |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2010 |
Bibliographical note
© 2010 Cambridge University PressKeywords
- Tense
- Future
- modality
- corpus
- time
- grammar
- English
- Huddleston