Why the Kantian ideal survives medical learning curves; and why it matters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The ‘Kantian ideal’ is often misunderstood as invoking individual autonomy rather than rational self-legislation. Le Morvan and Stock’s otherwise insightful discussion of ‘Medical learning curves and the Kantian ideal’, for example, draws the mistaken inference that that ideal is inconsistent with the realities of medical practice. But it is not. Rationally to be a patient entails accepting its necessary conditions, one of which is the ineliminable existence of medical learning curves. Their rational necessity, therefore, offers no grounds against a Kantian understanding of how morality might function in the practgice of medicine.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)511-512
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume32
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Immanuel Kant
Ideal
Learning Curve
Medicine
Legislation
Morality
Autonomy
Medical Practice
Inference

Cite this

@article{8ea134e0c00248c3bab2801f9996a193,
title = "Why the Kantian ideal survives medical learning curves; and why it matters",
abstract = "The ‘Kantian ideal’ is often misunderstood as invoking individual autonomy rather than rational self-legislation. Le Morvan and Stock’s otherwise insightful discussion of ‘Medical learning curves and the Kantian ideal’, for example, draws the mistaken inference that that ideal is inconsistent with the realities of medical practice. But it is not. Rationally to be a patient entails accepting its necessary conditions, one of which is the ineliminable existence of medical learning curves. Their rational necessity, therefore, offers no grounds against a Kantian understanding of how morality might function in the practgice of medicine.",
author = "Bob Brecher",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1136/jme.2005.014704",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "511--512",
journal = "Journal of Medical Ethics",
issn = "0306-6800",
number = "9",

}

Why the Kantian ideal survives medical learning curves; and why it matters. / Brecher, Bob.

In: Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 32, No. 9, 2006, p. 511-512.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why the Kantian ideal survives medical learning curves; and why it matters

AU - Brecher, Bob

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - The ‘Kantian ideal’ is often misunderstood as invoking individual autonomy rather than rational self-legislation. Le Morvan and Stock’s otherwise insightful discussion of ‘Medical learning curves and the Kantian ideal’, for example, draws the mistaken inference that that ideal is inconsistent with the realities of medical practice. But it is not. Rationally to be a patient entails accepting its necessary conditions, one of which is the ineliminable existence of medical learning curves. Their rational necessity, therefore, offers no grounds against a Kantian understanding of how morality might function in the practgice of medicine.

AB - The ‘Kantian ideal’ is often misunderstood as invoking individual autonomy rather than rational self-legislation. Le Morvan and Stock’s otherwise insightful discussion of ‘Medical learning curves and the Kantian ideal’, for example, draws the mistaken inference that that ideal is inconsistent with the realities of medical practice. But it is not. Rationally to be a patient entails accepting its necessary conditions, one of which is the ineliminable existence of medical learning curves. Their rational necessity, therefore, offers no grounds against a Kantian understanding of how morality might function in the practgice of medicine.

U2 - 10.1136/jme.2005.014704

DO - 10.1136/jme.2005.014704

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 511

EP - 512

JO - Journal of Medical Ethics

JF - Journal of Medical Ethics

SN - 0306-6800

IS - 9

ER -