Abstract
There is a fundamental divergence of opinion between the EU and the US over how food products derived from genetically modified organisms should be labeled. This has less to do with safety, as moves towards the international harmonization of safety standards continue apace, and rather more to do with the consumers' right to know about the origins of the food they are consuming. This paper uses a framework drawn from the global public goods (GPG) literature of economics and the work by international relations theorists on formal international organizations (FIO) to explain why there is presently no global consensus on the manner (voluntary or mandatory) in which GM food products should be labeled.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 287-298 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Agriculture and Human Values |
| Volume | 21 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2004 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'When goliaths clash: US and EU differences over the labeling of food products derived from genetically modified organisms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver