TY - JOUR
T1 - When goliaths clash
T2 - US and EU differences over the labeling of food products derived from genetically modified organisms
AU - Thorpe, Andy
AU - Robinson, Catherine
PY - 2004/1/1
Y1 - 2004/1/1
N2 - There is a fundamental divergence of opinion between the EU and the US over how food products derived from genetically modified organisms should be labeled. This has less to do with safety, as moves towards the international harmonization of safety standards continue apace, and rather more to do with the consumers' right to know about the origins of the food they are consuming. This paper uses a framework drawn from the global public goods (GPG) literature of economics and the work by international relations theorists on formal international organizations (FIO) to explain why there is presently no global consensus on the manner (voluntary or mandatory) in which GM food products should be labeled.
AB - There is a fundamental divergence of opinion between the EU and the US over how food products derived from genetically modified organisms should be labeled. This has less to do with safety, as moves towards the international harmonization of safety standards continue apace, and rather more to do with the consumers' right to know about the origins of the food they are consuming. This paper uses a framework drawn from the global public goods (GPG) literature of economics and the work by international relations theorists on formal international organizations (FIO) to explain why there is presently no global consensus on the manner (voluntary or mandatory) in which GM food products should be labeled.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-2942593252&partnerID=MN8TOARS
U2 - 10.1007/s10460-003-1204-8
DO - 10.1007/s10460-003-1204-8
M3 - Article
SN - 0889-048X
VL - 21
SP - 287
EP - 298
JO - Agriculture and Human Values
JF - Agriculture and Human Values
ER -