TY - JOUR
T1 - What works in engaging communities? Prioritising nutrition interventions in Burkina Faso, Ghana and South Africa
AU - Watson, Daniella
AU - Barker, Mary
AU - Boua, P. Romuald
AU - Chatio, Samuel
AU - Compaoré, Adelaide
AU - Danis, Marion
AU - Dalaba, Maxwell
AU - Erzse, Agnes
AU - Hardy-Johnson, Polly
AU - Kehoe, Sarah H.
AU - Hofman, Karen J.
AU - Lawrence, Wendy T.
AU - Nonterah, Engelbert A.
AU - Sorgho, Hermann
AU - Rwafa-Ponela, Teurai
AU - Ward, Kate A.
AU - Oduro, Abraham
AU - Adoctor, James
AU - Welaga, Paul
AU - Beeri, Paula
AU - Dambayi, Edith
AU - Nonterah, Esmond W.
AU - Ofosu, Winfred
AU - Ayibisah, Doreen
AU - Ouedraogo, Kadija
AU - Rouamba, Toussaint
AU - Derra, Karim
AU - Welgo, Aminata
AU - Tinto, Halidou
AU - Goldstein, Susan
AU - Mdewa, Winfreda
AU - Edoka, Ijeoma
AU - Hanson, Mark
AU - Fall, Caroline
AU - Cohen, Emmanuel
AU - Wrottesley, Stephanie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Watson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2023/12/13
Y1 - 2023/12/13
N2 - Background “Choosing All Together” (CHAT), is a community engagement tool designed to give the public a voice in how best to allocate limited resources to improve population health. This process evaluation explored the mechanisms through which CHAT generates community engagement. Method The CHAT tool was adapted and implemented for use in two rural communities (Nanoro, Burkina Faso, and Navrongo, Ghana) and one urban township (Soweto, South Africa) to prioritize maternal and child nutrition interventions. Community discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and translated into English. Twenty-two transcripts, including six each from Navrongo and Soweto and 10 from Nanoro, were analysed thematically to generate data driven codes and themes to explain mechanisms underlying the CHAT process. The process evaluation was based on the UK MRC process evaluation guidance. Results Seven themes describing the functions and outcomes of CHAT were identified. Themes described participants deliberating trade-offs, working together, agreeing on priorities, having a shared vision, and increasing their knowledge, also the skills of the facilitator, and a process of power sharing between participants and researchers. Participants came to an agreement of priorities when they had a shared vision. Trained facilitators are important to facilitate meaningful discussion between participants and those with lower levels of literacy to participate fully. Conclusion CHAT has been shown to be adaptable and useful in prioritising maternal and child nutrition interventions in communities in Burkina Faso, Ghana, and South Africa. Conducting CHAT in communities over a longer period and involving policy-makers would increase trust, mutual respect and develop partnerships.
AB - Background “Choosing All Together” (CHAT), is a community engagement tool designed to give the public a voice in how best to allocate limited resources to improve population health. This process evaluation explored the mechanisms through which CHAT generates community engagement. Method The CHAT tool was adapted and implemented for use in two rural communities (Nanoro, Burkina Faso, and Navrongo, Ghana) and one urban township (Soweto, South Africa) to prioritize maternal and child nutrition interventions. Community discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and translated into English. Twenty-two transcripts, including six each from Navrongo and Soweto and 10 from Nanoro, were analysed thematically to generate data driven codes and themes to explain mechanisms underlying the CHAT process. The process evaluation was based on the UK MRC process evaluation guidance. Results Seven themes describing the functions and outcomes of CHAT were identified. Themes described participants deliberating trade-offs, working together, agreeing on priorities, having a shared vision, and increasing their knowledge, also the skills of the facilitator, and a process of power sharing between participants and researchers. Participants came to an agreement of priorities when they had a shared vision. Trained facilitators are important to facilitate meaningful discussion between participants and those with lower levels of literacy to participate fully. Conclusion CHAT has been shown to be adaptable and useful in prioritising maternal and child nutrition interventions in communities in Burkina Faso, Ghana, and South Africa. Conducting CHAT in communities over a longer period and involving policy-makers would increase trust, mutual respect and develop partnerships.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85179640306&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0294410
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0294410
M3 - Article
C2 - 38091334
AN - SCOPUS:85179640306
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 18
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 12
M1 - e0294410
ER -