What was once proven can now only be imagined: Overall I am satisfied

Luke Pendrell

Research output: Working paperResearch

Abstract

In this paper I argue that the Art School, in its various incarnations throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, was, not just a site of personal transformation but of radical societal change. Offering crucibles of experimentation and radical visions of what the world could be, and might be constructed, in spaces in which it was possible to “desire, conceive, and create the new structure of the future”[1] Such places if not already gone are under pressure. Out of step with a culture in which as Wendy Brown notes “social equality, liberty, and worldly development of mind and character are outmoded and have been displaced by another set of metrics: income streams, profitability, technological innovation.”[2] An education culture of league tables, excellence frameworks of personal entrepreneurial ‘success’ and ‘student satisfaction’ In this paralysis of the cultural imaginary it has been recently argued that, “the future has been cancelled.”[3] Can a reconfigured “Art school” side step nostalgia and be utilised in the conception of radical new structures? By taking Ranciere’s conception of a “critical art” to “produce a new perception of the world, and therefore to create a commitment to its transformation.” How can we re-engineer the future in the neoliberal value system? The solution seems obvious: In order to reengineer the future we must first reimagine it. [1] Walter Gropius “Bauhaus Manifesto and Program” 1919 [2] Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism's Stealth Revolution - Zone Books [3] #ACCELERATE MANIFESTO for an Accelerationist Politics, Alex Williams & Nick Srnicek, 14 May 2013
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2017

Fingerprint

Art School
Conception
Walter Gropius
Crucible
Manifesto
Critical Arts
Revolution
Equality
Incarnation
Technological Innovation
League
Profitability
Excellence
Engineers
Value Systems
Experimentation
Education
Nostalgia
Neoliberalism
Liberty

Cite this

@techreport{bf764fe64c384c1f99977b23a4c6fd52,
title = "What was once proven can now only be imagined: Overall I am satisfied",
abstract = "In this paper I argue that the Art School, in its various incarnations throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, was, not just a site of personal transformation but of radical societal change. Offering crucibles of experimentation and radical visions of what the world could be, and might be constructed, in spaces in which it was possible to “desire, conceive, and create the new structure of the future”[1] Such places if not already gone are under pressure. Out of step with a culture in which as Wendy Brown notes “social equality, liberty, and worldly development of mind and character are outmoded and have been displaced by another set of metrics: income streams, profitability, technological innovation.”[2] An education culture of league tables, excellence frameworks of personal entrepreneurial ‘success’ and ‘student satisfaction’ In this paralysis of the cultural imaginary it has been recently argued that, “the future has been cancelled.”[3] Can a reconfigured “Art school” side step nostalgia and be utilised in the conception of radical new structures? By taking Ranciere’s conception of a “critical art” to “produce a new perception of the world, and therefore to create a commitment to its transformation.” How can we re-engineer the future in the neoliberal value system? The solution seems obvious: In order to reengineer the future we must first reimagine it. [1] Walter Gropius “Bauhaus Manifesto and Program” 1919 [2] Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism's Stealth Revolution - Zone Books [3] #ACCELERATE MANIFESTO for an Accelerationist Politics, Alex Williams & Nick Srnicek, 14 May 2013",
author = "Luke Pendrell",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
language = "English",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

What was once proven can now only be imagined: Overall I am satisfied. / Pendrell, Luke.

2017.

Research output: Working paperResearch

TY - UNPB

T1 - What was once proven can now only be imagined: Overall I am satisfied

AU - Pendrell, Luke

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - In this paper I argue that the Art School, in its various incarnations throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, was, not just a site of personal transformation but of radical societal change. Offering crucibles of experimentation and radical visions of what the world could be, and might be constructed, in spaces in which it was possible to “desire, conceive, and create the new structure of the future”[1] Such places if not already gone are under pressure. Out of step with a culture in which as Wendy Brown notes “social equality, liberty, and worldly development of mind and character are outmoded and have been displaced by another set of metrics: income streams, profitability, technological innovation.”[2] An education culture of league tables, excellence frameworks of personal entrepreneurial ‘success’ and ‘student satisfaction’ In this paralysis of the cultural imaginary it has been recently argued that, “the future has been cancelled.”[3] Can a reconfigured “Art school” side step nostalgia and be utilised in the conception of radical new structures? By taking Ranciere’s conception of a “critical art” to “produce a new perception of the world, and therefore to create a commitment to its transformation.” How can we re-engineer the future in the neoliberal value system? The solution seems obvious: In order to reengineer the future we must first reimagine it. [1] Walter Gropius “Bauhaus Manifesto and Program” 1919 [2] Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism's Stealth Revolution - Zone Books [3] #ACCELERATE MANIFESTO for an Accelerationist Politics, Alex Williams & Nick Srnicek, 14 May 2013

AB - In this paper I argue that the Art School, in its various incarnations throughout the 19th and 20th centuries, was, not just a site of personal transformation but of radical societal change. Offering crucibles of experimentation and radical visions of what the world could be, and might be constructed, in spaces in which it was possible to “desire, conceive, and create the new structure of the future”[1] Such places if not already gone are under pressure. Out of step with a culture in which as Wendy Brown notes “social equality, liberty, and worldly development of mind and character are outmoded and have been displaced by another set of metrics: income streams, profitability, technological innovation.”[2] An education culture of league tables, excellence frameworks of personal entrepreneurial ‘success’ and ‘student satisfaction’ In this paralysis of the cultural imaginary it has been recently argued that, “the future has been cancelled.”[3] Can a reconfigured “Art school” side step nostalgia and be utilised in the conception of radical new structures? By taking Ranciere’s conception of a “critical art” to “produce a new perception of the world, and therefore to create a commitment to its transformation.” How can we re-engineer the future in the neoliberal value system? The solution seems obvious: In order to reengineer the future we must first reimagine it. [1] Walter Gropius “Bauhaus Manifesto and Program” 1919 [2] Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism's Stealth Revolution - Zone Books [3] #ACCELERATE MANIFESTO for an Accelerationist Politics, Alex Williams & Nick Srnicek, 14 May 2013

M3 - Working paper

BT - What was once proven can now only be imagined: Overall I am satisfied

ER -