Vorwort

Tilo Amhoff, Henrik Hilbig, Gernot Weckherlin

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding with ISSN or ISBNChapter

Abstract

We know that architecture depends. But as soon as the description of the relations of dependency (heteronomy) and the freedom of their actors (autonomy) is made more concrete, the subject, architecture, seems to be almost dissolved between the established patterns of disciplinary views and interests. Which relations of dependency do we actually speak of? How do they materialise? What happens to our conception of architecture, if we not only consider ideas, designs, and their representations, but also material and labour, building technologies and the construction industry, and indeed the power of capital and its role in the creation of the built environment? In our opinion general theories about the question of autonomy in architecture should be replaced by specific investigations of concrete examples. With this book, we resume a discussion at the end of the 1960s and early 1970s in Germany, the analysis of urban and architectural planning by Klaus Brake, Helga Fassbinder, and Renate Petzinger, the critique of the bourgeois category of autonomy by Michael Müller, and the designation of architecture as the planning of building by Jörn Janssen. The two last authors have written central contributions to a more precise determination of the field of aesthetic and economic autonomy for this volume, which are also linked to this debate. However, for us these questions need to be asked new again today, especially as new methodological tools such as actor-network theory, science and technology studies, media and cultural studies, or New Materialism expand and enrich our field of research.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProduktionsbedingungen der Architektur: Zwischen Autonomie und Heteronomie
EditorsTilo Amhoff, Henrik Hilbig, Gernot Weckherlin
Place of PublicationDresden
PublisherThelem Universitätsverlag
Pages9-12
Number of pages4
ISBN (Print)9783945363652
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Publication series

NameForum Architekturwissenschaft

Fingerprint

Autonomy
Planning
Aesthetics
Cultural Studies
Labor
Designation
1970s
Built Environment
Germany
Construction Industry
Actor-network Theory
General Theory
Conception
Economics
Materialism
1960s
Media Studies
Heteronomy

Cite this

Amhoff, T., Hilbig, H., & Weckherlin, G. (2018). Vorwort. In T. Amhoff, H. Hilbig, & G. Weckherlin (Eds.), Produktionsbedingungen der Architektur: Zwischen Autonomie und Heteronomie (pp. 9-12). (Forum Architekturwissenschaft). Dresden: Thelem Universitätsverlag.
Amhoff, Tilo ; Hilbig, Henrik ; Weckherlin, Gernot. / Vorwort. Produktionsbedingungen der Architektur: Zwischen Autonomie und Heteronomie. editor / Tilo Amhoff ; Henrik Hilbig ; Gernot Weckherlin. Dresden : Thelem Universitätsverlag, 2018. pp. 9-12 (Forum Architekturwissenschaft).
@inbook{be0e3fec4ea94c479f22cc46d0a62dc5,
title = "Vorwort",
abstract = "We know that architecture depends. But as soon as the description of the relations of dependency (heteronomy) and the freedom of their actors (autonomy) is made more concrete, the subject, architecture, seems to be almost dissolved between the established patterns of disciplinary views and interests. Which relations of dependency do we actually speak of? How do they materialise? What happens to our conception of architecture, if we not only consider ideas, designs, and their representations, but also material and labour, building technologies and the construction industry, and indeed the power of capital and its role in the creation of the built environment? In our opinion general theories about the question of autonomy in architecture should be replaced by specific investigations of concrete examples. With this book, we resume a discussion at the end of the 1960s and early 1970s in Germany, the analysis of urban and architectural planning by Klaus Brake, Helga Fassbinder, and Renate Petzinger, the critique of the bourgeois category of autonomy by Michael M{\"u}ller, and the designation of architecture as the planning of building by J{\"o}rn Janssen. The two last authors have written central contributions to a more precise determination of the field of aesthetic and economic autonomy for this volume, which are also linked to this debate. However, for us these questions need to be asked new again today, especially as new methodological tools such as actor-network theory, science and technology studies, media and cultural studies, or New Materialism expand and enrich our field of research.",
author = "Tilo Amhoff and Henrik Hilbig and Gernot Weckherlin",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783945363652",
series = "Forum Architekturwissenschaft",
publisher = "Thelem Universit{\"a}tsverlag",
pages = "9--12",
editor = "Tilo Amhoff and Henrik Hilbig and Gernot Weckherlin",
booktitle = "Produktionsbedingungen der Architektur: Zwischen Autonomie und Heteronomie",

}

Amhoff, T, Hilbig, H & Weckherlin, G 2018, Vorwort. in T Amhoff, H Hilbig & G Weckherlin (eds), Produktionsbedingungen der Architektur: Zwischen Autonomie und Heteronomie. Forum Architekturwissenschaft, Thelem Universitätsverlag, Dresden, pp. 9-12.

Vorwort. / Amhoff, Tilo; Hilbig, Henrik; Weckherlin, Gernot.

Produktionsbedingungen der Architektur: Zwischen Autonomie und Heteronomie. ed. / Tilo Amhoff; Henrik Hilbig; Gernot Weckherlin. Dresden : Thelem Universitätsverlag, 2018. p. 9-12 (Forum Architekturwissenschaft).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding with ISSN or ISBNChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Vorwort

AU - Amhoff, Tilo

AU - Hilbig, Henrik

AU - Weckherlin, Gernot

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - We know that architecture depends. But as soon as the description of the relations of dependency (heteronomy) and the freedom of their actors (autonomy) is made more concrete, the subject, architecture, seems to be almost dissolved between the established patterns of disciplinary views and interests. Which relations of dependency do we actually speak of? How do they materialise? What happens to our conception of architecture, if we not only consider ideas, designs, and their representations, but also material and labour, building technologies and the construction industry, and indeed the power of capital and its role in the creation of the built environment? In our opinion general theories about the question of autonomy in architecture should be replaced by specific investigations of concrete examples. With this book, we resume a discussion at the end of the 1960s and early 1970s in Germany, the analysis of urban and architectural planning by Klaus Brake, Helga Fassbinder, and Renate Petzinger, the critique of the bourgeois category of autonomy by Michael Müller, and the designation of architecture as the planning of building by Jörn Janssen. The two last authors have written central contributions to a more precise determination of the field of aesthetic and economic autonomy for this volume, which are also linked to this debate. However, for us these questions need to be asked new again today, especially as new methodological tools such as actor-network theory, science and technology studies, media and cultural studies, or New Materialism expand and enrich our field of research.

AB - We know that architecture depends. But as soon as the description of the relations of dependency (heteronomy) and the freedom of their actors (autonomy) is made more concrete, the subject, architecture, seems to be almost dissolved between the established patterns of disciplinary views and interests. Which relations of dependency do we actually speak of? How do they materialise? What happens to our conception of architecture, if we not only consider ideas, designs, and their representations, but also material and labour, building technologies and the construction industry, and indeed the power of capital and its role in the creation of the built environment? In our opinion general theories about the question of autonomy in architecture should be replaced by specific investigations of concrete examples. With this book, we resume a discussion at the end of the 1960s and early 1970s in Germany, the analysis of urban and architectural planning by Klaus Brake, Helga Fassbinder, and Renate Petzinger, the critique of the bourgeois category of autonomy by Michael Müller, and the designation of architecture as the planning of building by Jörn Janssen. The two last authors have written central contributions to a more precise determination of the field of aesthetic and economic autonomy for this volume, which are also linked to this debate. However, for us these questions need to be asked new again today, especially as new methodological tools such as actor-network theory, science and technology studies, media and cultural studies, or New Materialism expand and enrich our field of research.

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783945363652

T3 - Forum Architekturwissenschaft

SP - 9

EP - 12

BT - Produktionsbedingungen der Architektur: Zwischen Autonomie und Heteronomie

A2 - Amhoff, Tilo

A2 - Hilbig, Henrik

A2 - Weckherlin, Gernot

PB - Thelem Universitätsverlag

CY - Dresden

ER -

Amhoff T, Hilbig H, Weckherlin G. Vorwort. In Amhoff T, Hilbig H, Weckherlin G, editors, Produktionsbedingungen der Architektur: Zwischen Autonomie und Heteronomie. Dresden: Thelem Universitätsverlag. 2018. p. 9-12. (Forum Architekturwissenschaft).