Using geoarchaeological deposit modelling as a framework for archaeological evaluation and mitigation in alluvial environments

Christopher Carey, Andy Howard, Robin Jackson, Antony Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The pace of anthropogenic development on floodplains and adjacent valley floors is still increasing and in many countries this is accompanied by a requirement for heritage mitigation and management. The result is an increased demand for effective and efficient archaeological evaluation and mitigation strategies, which can only be achieved in alluvial environments through the application of geoarchaeological methods. This paper uses lidar data combined with deep geophysical survey (electrical resistivity), gouge coring and limited borehole data to derive a three dimensional geoarchaeological deposit model, which provided a vehicle for archaeological evaluation and mitigation. Significantly, the results of this deposit model are compared to the results from the subsequent archaeological evaluation trenching, a methodological next step that has not received sufficient attention within the (geo)archaeological literature. The deposit model is refined using radiocarbon dating and artefactual evidence derived from the archaeological evaluation trenching. The results demonstrate how geoarchaeological deposit modelling can be integrated with archaeological evaluation trenching and provides discussion of the importance and difficulties of integrating geoarchaeological sediment units (archives) with archaeological contextual excavation data, with conventional stratigraphic matrices.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)658-673
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Archaeological Science: Reports
Volume11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

mitigation
modeling
geophysical survey
radiocarbon dating
lidar
floodplain
electrical resistivity
excavation
borehole
evaluation
valley
matrix
sediment

Bibliographical note

© 2017. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Keywords

  • Alluvial geoarchaeology
  • Archaeological evaluation
  • Deposit modelling
  • Chronostratigraphy

Cite this

@article{f09988a396b64764a27d03ab30118345,
title = "Using geoarchaeological deposit modelling as a framework for archaeological evaluation and mitigation in alluvial environments",
abstract = "The pace of anthropogenic development on floodplains and adjacent valley floors is still increasing and in many countries this is accompanied by a requirement for heritage mitigation and management. The result is an increased demand for effective and efficient archaeological evaluation and mitigation strategies, which can only be achieved in alluvial environments through the application of geoarchaeological methods. This paper uses lidar data combined with deep geophysical survey (electrical resistivity), gouge coring and limited borehole data to derive a three dimensional geoarchaeological deposit model, which provided a vehicle for archaeological evaluation and mitigation. Significantly, the results of this deposit model are compared to the results from the subsequent archaeological evaluation trenching, a methodological next step that has not received sufficient attention within the (geo)archaeological literature. The deposit model is refined using radiocarbon dating and artefactual evidence derived from the archaeological evaluation trenching. The results demonstrate how geoarchaeological deposit modelling can be integrated with archaeological evaluation trenching and provides discussion of the importance and difficulties of integrating geoarchaeological sediment units (archives) with archaeological contextual excavation data, with conventional stratigraphic matrices.",
keywords = "Alluvial geoarchaeology, Archaeological evaluation, Deposit modelling, Chronostratigraphy",
author = "Christopher Carey and Andy Howard and Robin Jackson and Antony Brown",
note = "{\circledC} 2017. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.01.013",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "658--673",
journal = "Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports",
issn = "2352-409X",

}

Using geoarchaeological deposit modelling as a framework for archaeological evaluation and mitigation in alluvial environments. / Carey, Christopher; Howard, Andy; Jackson, Robin; Brown, Antony.

In: Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, Vol. 11, 14.01.2017, p. 658-673.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using geoarchaeological deposit modelling as a framework for archaeological evaluation and mitigation in alluvial environments

AU - Carey, Christopher

AU - Howard, Andy

AU - Jackson, Robin

AU - Brown, Antony

N1 - © 2017. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

PY - 2017/1/14

Y1 - 2017/1/14

N2 - The pace of anthropogenic development on floodplains and adjacent valley floors is still increasing and in many countries this is accompanied by a requirement for heritage mitigation and management. The result is an increased demand for effective and efficient archaeological evaluation and mitigation strategies, which can only be achieved in alluvial environments through the application of geoarchaeological methods. This paper uses lidar data combined with deep geophysical survey (electrical resistivity), gouge coring and limited borehole data to derive a three dimensional geoarchaeological deposit model, which provided a vehicle for archaeological evaluation and mitigation. Significantly, the results of this deposit model are compared to the results from the subsequent archaeological evaluation trenching, a methodological next step that has not received sufficient attention within the (geo)archaeological literature. The deposit model is refined using radiocarbon dating and artefactual evidence derived from the archaeological evaluation trenching. The results demonstrate how geoarchaeological deposit modelling can be integrated with archaeological evaluation trenching and provides discussion of the importance and difficulties of integrating geoarchaeological sediment units (archives) with archaeological contextual excavation data, with conventional stratigraphic matrices.

AB - The pace of anthropogenic development on floodplains and adjacent valley floors is still increasing and in many countries this is accompanied by a requirement for heritage mitigation and management. The result is an increased demand for effective and efficient archaeological evaluation and mitigation strategies, which can only be achieved in alluvial environments through the application of geoarchaeological methods. This paper uses lidar data combined with deep geophysical survey (electrical resistivity), gouge coring and limited borehole data to derive a three dimensional geoarchaeological deposit model, which provided a vehicle for archaeological evaluation and mitigation. Significantly, the results of this deposit model are compared to the results from the subsequent archaeological evaluation trenching, a methodological next step that has not received sufficient attention within the (geo)archaeological literature. The deposit model is refined using radiocarbon dating and artefactual evidence derived from the archaeological evaluation trenching. The results demonstrate how geoarchaeological deposit modelling can be integrated with archaeological evaluation trenching and provides discussion of the importance and difficulties of integrating geoarchaeological sediment units (archives) with archaeological contextual excavation data, with conventional stratigraphic matrices.

KW - Alluvial geoarchaeology

KW - Archaeological evaluation

KW - Deposit modelling

KW - Chronostratigraphy

U2 - 10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.01.013

DO - 10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.01.013

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 658

EP - 673

JO - Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports

JF - Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports

SN - 2352-409X

ER -