Using a Conceptual Site Model for Assessing the Sustainability of Brownfield Regeneration for a Soft Reuse: A Case Study of Port Sunlight River Park (U.K.)

Xiaonuo Li, Richard Bardos, Andrew Cundy, Marie K. Harder, Kieron Doick, Jenny Norrman , Sarah Williams, Weiping Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Brownfield regeneration to soft reuse such as recreation and amenity has become increasingly common due to the demand for the potential environmental, social and economic benefits that it can deliver. This has led in turn to an increased demand for improved tools to support decision-making for this style of regeneration: tools which are simple to use, based on robust scientific principles and preferably which can ultimately link to quantitative or semi-quantitative cost-benefit analyses. This work presents an approach to assessing and comparing different scenarios for brownfield regeneration to soft reuse and other end-points. A "sustainability linkages” approach, based on sustainability assessment criteria produced by the UK Sustainable Remediation Forum (SuRF-UK), is developed and used in a refined qualitative sustainability assessment, and applied to develop a conceptual site model of sustainability, for a specific case study site (Port Sunlight River Park, U.K., a public leisure park established and maintained on a capped and managed former landfill site). Ranking, on an ex post basis, highlighted the clear sustainability advantages that the establishment of the Port Sunlight River Park has compared with a hypothetical non-development scenario. The conceptual site model provides a clearer basis for understanding cause and effect for benefits and disbenefits and a rationale for grouping individual effects based on their ease of valuation, providing a road map for cost-benefit assessments by (1) being able to match specific linkages to the most appropriate means of valuation, and (2) transparently connecting the sustainability assessment and cost benefit assessment processes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)810-821
Number of pages12
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume652
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

regeneration
sustainability
river
valuation
amenity
ranking
landfill
remediation
economics
cost-benefit
effect
demand

Bibliographical note

This paper is an output from a secondment of Xiaonuo Li to SET, University of Brighton

Keywords

  • SuRF-UK guidance
  • Sustainability linkage
  • Qualitative sustainability assessment
  • Overall benefits

Cite this

@article{a5589c27ca0f40bdaf05f7fc0452fa97,
title = "Using a Conceptual Site Model for Assessing the Sustainability of Brownfield Regeneration for a Soft Reuse: A Case Study of Port Sunlight River Park (U.K.)",
abstract = "Brownfield regeneration to soft reuse such as recreation and amenity has become increasingly common due to the demand for the potential environmental, social and economic benefits that it can deliver. This has led in turn to an increased demand for improved tools to support decision-making for this style of regeneration: tools which are simple to use, based on robust scientific principles and preferably which can ultimately link to quantitative or semi-quantitative cost-benefit analyses. This work presents an approach to assessing and comparing different scenarios for brownfield regeneration to soft reuse and other end-points. A {"}sustainability linkages” approach, based on sustainability assessment criteria produced by the UK Sustainable Remediation Forum (SuRF-UK), is developed and used in a refined qualitative sustainability assessment, and applied to develop a conceptual site model of sustainability, for a specific case study site (Port Sunlight River Park, U.K., a public leisure park established and maintained on a capped and managed former landfill site). Ranking, on an ex post basis, highlighted the clear sustainability advantages that the establishment of the Port Sunlight River Park has compared with a hypothetical non-development scenario. The conceptual site model provides a clearer basis for understanding cause and effect for benefits and disbenefits and a rationale for grouping individual effects based on their ease of valuation, providing a road map for cost-benefit assessments by (1) being able to match specific linkages to the most appropriate means of valuation, and (2) transparently connecting the sustainability assessment and cost benefit assessment processes.",
keywords = "SuRF-UK guidance, Sustainability linkage, Qualitative sustainability assessment, Overall benefits",
author = "Xiaonuo Li and Richard Bardos and Andrew Cundy and Harder, {Marie K.} and Kieron Doick and Jenny Norrman and Sarah Williams and Weiping Chen",
note = "This paper is an output from a secondment of Xiaonuo Li to SET, University of Brighton",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.278",
language = "English",
volume = "652",
pages = "810--821",
journal = "Science of the Total Environment",
issn = "0048-9697",

}

Using a Conceptual Site Model for Assessing the Sustainability of Brownfield Regeneration for a Soft Reuse : A Case Study of Port Sunlight River Park (U.K.). / Li, Xiaonuo; Bardos, Richard; Cundy, Andrew; Harder, Marie K.; Doick, Kieron; Norrman , Jenny; Williams, Sarah; Chen, Weiping.

In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 652, 20.02.2019, p. 810-821.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using a Conceptual Site Model for Assessing the Sustainability of Brownfield Regeneration for a Soft Reuse

T2 - Science of the Total Environment

AU - Li, Xiaonuo

AU - Bardos, Richard

AU - Cundy, Andrew

AU - Harder, Marie K.

AU - Doick, Kieron

AU - Norrman , Jenny

AU - Williams, Sarah

AU - Chen, Weiping

N1 - This paper is an output from a secondment of Xiaonuo Li to SET, University of Brighton

PY - 2019/2/20

Y1 - 2019/2/20

N2 - Brownfield regeneration to soft reuse such as recreation and amenity has become increasingly common due to the demand for the potential environmental, social and economic benefits that it can deliver. This has led in turn to an increased demand for improved tools to support decision-making for this style of regeneration: tools which are simple to use, based on robust scientific principles and preferably which can ultimately link to quantitative or semi-quantitative cost-benefit analyses. This work presents an approach to assessing and comparing different scenarios for brownfield regeneration to soft reuse and other end-points. A "sustainability linkages” approach, based on sustainability assessment criteria produced by the UK Sustainable Remediation Forum (SuRF-UK), is developed and used in a refined qualitative sustainability assessment, and applied to develop a conceptual site model of sustainability, for a specific case study site (Port Sunlight River Park, U.K., a public leisure park established and maintained on a capped and managed former landfill site). Ranking, on an ex post basis, highlighted the clear sustainability advantages that the establishment of the Port Sunlight River Park has compared with a hypothetical non-development scenario. The conceptual site model provides a clearer basis for understanding cause and effect for benefits and disbenefits and a rationale for grouping individual effects based on their ease of valuation, providing a road map for cost-benefit assessments by (1) being able to match specific linkages to the most appropriate means of valuation, and (2) transparently connecting the sustainability assessment and cost benefit assessment processes.

AB - Brownfield regeneration to soft reuse such as recreation and amenity has become increasingly common due to the demand for the potential environmental, social and economic benefits that it can deliver. This has led in turn to an increased demand for improved tools to support decision-making for this style of regeneration: tools which are simple to use, based on robust scientific principles and preferably which can ultimately link to quantitative or semi-quantitative cost-benefit analyses. This work presents an approach to assessing and comparing different scenarios for brownfield regeneration to soft reuse and other end-points. A "sustainability linkages” approach, based on sustainability assessment criteria produced by the UK Sustainable Remediation Forum (SuRF-UK), is developed and used in a refined qualitative sustainability assessment, and applied to develop a conceptual site model of sustainability, for a specific case study site (Port Sunlight River Park, U.K., a public leisure park established and maintained on a capped and managed former landfill site). Ranking, on an ex post basis, highlighted the clear sustainability advantages that the establishment of the Port Sunlight River Park has compared with a hypothetical non-development scenario. The conceptual site model provides a clearer basis for understanding cause and effect for benefits and disbenefits and a rationale for grouping individual effects based on their ease of valuation, providing a road map for cost-benefit assessments by (1) being able to match specific linkages to the most appropriate means of valuation, and (2) transparently connecting the sustainability assessment and cost benefit assessment processes.

KW - SuRF-UK guidance

KW - Sustainability linkage

KW - Qualitative sustainability assessment

KW - Overall benefits

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055517994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.278

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.278

M3 - Article

VL - 652

SP - 810

EP - 821

JO - Science of the Total Environment

JF - Science of the Total Environment

SN - 0048-9697

ER -