Undercover policing and the spectre of ‘domestic extremism’: the covert surveillance of environmental activism in Britain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The spectre of environmental ‘domestic extremism’ has long been postulated by police leaders and security analysts in Britain. It is a narrative that has justified the commitment of enormous amounts of government resources towards police intelligence work directed at non-violent direct action campaigns. Most controversially, this has included the long-term infiltration of environmental (and other) activist groups by undercover police. This article provides a critical analysis of the justifications put forward in support of the covert surveillance of environmental activists in Britain. The paper proceeds by way of a single case study – a high profile, environmental direct action protest in the north of England – in order to reveal the levels of abuse, manipulation and deception at the basis of undercover protest policing. Through their court case, the activists involved with this action were able to obtain rare insights into the police authorisation documents for the undercover operation that had led to their arrests. An analysis of these documents provides us with a glimpse of the contradictory justifications given by senior police officers for infiltration – now under scrutiny by a public inquiry.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)491-506
JournalSocial Movement Studies
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

radicalism
surveillance
police
subversion
protest
authorization
police officer
manipulation
intelligence
abuse
campaign
commitment
leader
narrative
resources
Group

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Social Movement Studies on 01/06/2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14742837.2018.1480934

Cite this

@article{c05a3051e0e3487ca9686aee55023fcb,
title = "Undercover policing and the spectre of ‘domestic extremism’: the covert surveillance of environmental activism in Britain",
abstract = "The spectre of environmental ‘domestic extremism’ has long been postulated by police leaders and security analysts in Britain. It is a narrative that has justified the commitment of enormous amounts of government resources towards police intelligence work directed at non-violent direct action campaigns. Most controversially, this has included the long-term infiltration of environmental (and other) activist groups by undercover police. This article provides a critical analysis of the justifications put forward in support of the covert surveillance of environmental activists in Britain. The paper proceeds by way of a single case study – a high profile, environmental direct action protest in the north of England – in order to reveal the levels of abuse, manipulation and deception at the basis of undercover protest policing. Through their court case, the activists involved with this action were able to obtain rare insights into the police authorisation documents for the undercover operation that had led to their arrests. An analysis of these documents provides us with a glimpse of the contradictory justifications given by senior police officers for infiltration – now under scrutiny by a public inquiry.",
author = "Raphael Schlembach",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Social Movement Studies on 01/06/2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14742837.2018.1480934",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/14742837.2018.1480934",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "491--506",
journal = "Social Movement Studies",
issn = "1474-2837",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Undercover policing and the spectre of ‘domestic extremism’

T2 - the covert surveillance of environmental activism in Britain

AU - Schlembach, Raphael

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Social Movement Studies on 01/06/2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14742837.2018.1480934

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - The spectre of environmental ‘domestic extremism’ has long been postulated by police leaders and security analysts in Britain. It is a narrative that has justified the commitment of enormous amounts of government resources towards police intelligence work directed at non-violent direct action campaigns. Most controversially, this has included the long-term infiltration of environmental (and other) activist groups by undercover police. This article provides a critical analysis of the justifications put forward in support of the covert surveillance of environmental activists in Britain. The paper proceeds by way of a single case study – a high profile, environmental direct action protest in the north of England – in order to reveal the levels of abuse, manipulation and deception at the basis of undercover protest policing. Through their court case, the activists involved with this action were able to obtain rare insights into the police authorisation documents for the undercover operation that had led to their arrests. An analysis of these documents provides us with a glimpse of the contradictory justifications given by senior police officers for infiltration – now under scrutiny by a public inquiry.

AB - The spectre of environmental ‘domestic extremism’ has long been postulated by police leaders and security analysts in Britain. It is a narrative that has justified the commitment of enormous amounts of government resources towards police intelligence work directed at non-violent direct action campaigns. Most controversially, this has included the long-term infiltration of environmental (and other) activist groups by undercover police. This article provides a critical analysis of the justifications put forward in support of the covert surveillance of environmental activists in Britain. The paper proceeds by way of a single case study – a high profile, environmental direct action protest in the north of England – in order to reveal the levels of abuse, manipulation and deception at the basis of undercover protest policing. Through their court case, the activists involved with this action were able to obtain rare insights into the police authorisation documents for the undercover operation that had led to their arrests. An analysis of these documents provides us with a glimpse of the contradictory justifications given by senior police officers for infiltration – now under scrutiny by a public inquiry.

U2 - 10.1080/14742837.2018.1480934

DO - 10.1080/14742837.2018.1480934

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 491

EP - 506

JO - Social Movement Studies

JF - Social Movement Studies

SN - 1474-2837

IS - 5

ER -