Toy department within the toy department? Online sports journalists and professional legitimacy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study explores the professional legitimacy of online sports journalists as an
emergent group within the occupation in the United Kingdom. Two typologies of
sports journalists working for national news organisations are identified (traditional and online) and semi-structured interviews conducted with both groups. Drawing on concepts from the sociology of professions, the study applies three sub-definitions of professionalism – normative, cognitive and evaluative – to online sports journalism.

The findings indicate that online sports journalists both see themselves and are seen as professionally illegitimate in all three sub-definitions despite a reputation for digital innovation. Sports journalists consider their professional jurisdiction to be defined by traditional norms, values and practices while refusing to accommodate newer, digitally native approaches. Traditional sports journalists enhance their legitimacy by positioning online colleagues as a ‘toy department within a toy department’, similar to how news journalists disparage the sports desk to elevate their own professional claims.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1415-1431
JournalJournalism
Volume21
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Sept 2018

Bibliographical note

Simon McEnnis, Toy department within the toy department? Online sports journalists and professional legitimacy, Journalism. Copyright © 2018 The Author(s) . Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications.

Keywords

  • Boundary work
  • professionalism
  • digital journalism
  • online journalism
  • sports journalism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Toy department within the toy department? Online sports journalists and professional legitimacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this