TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards a cell-inspired approach for a sustainable internet-of-things
AU - Maamar, Zakaria
AU - Faci, Noura
AU - Ugljanin, Emir
AU - Baker, Thar
AU - Burégio, Vanilson
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/4/9
Y1 - 2021/4/9
N2 - By analogy to cells that grow, split, merge, and die, this paper applies same operations to things residing in an open Internet-of-Things (IoT) ecosystem. Despite the growing interest in IoT, things are mainly “busy” with sensing and (some) actuating, which prevents them from being responsive to changes in this ecosystem. To address this limitation, this paper proposes mutation as a novel mechanism for making things responsive and hence, capable of either satisfying “unseen” needs or seizing “unexpected” opportunities. To approve/deny mutation, a decision-making process is initiated progressing over 4 stopovers (obligation, permission, prohibition, and dispensation) along with 4 stages (awareness, pre-mutation, mutation-itself, and post-mutation) that would allow to answer questions such as why to approve/deny mutation, how to prepare mutation, and how to evaluate mutation. A testbed demonstrating the technical doability of thing mutation along with the conducted experiments are also discussed in the paper.
AB - By analogy to cells that grow, split, merge, and die, this paper applies same operations to things residing in an open Internet-of-Things (IoT) ecosystem. Despite the growing interest in IoT, things are mainly “busy” with sensing and (some) actuating, which prevents them from being responsive to changes in this ecosystem. To address this limitation, this paper proposes mutation as a novel mechanism for making things responsive and hence, capable of either satisfying “unseen” needs or seizing “unexpected” opportunities. To approve/deny mutation, a decision-making process is initiated progressing over 4 stopovers (obligation, permission, prohibition, and dispensation) along with 4 stages (awareness, pre-mutation, mutation-itself, and post-mutation) that would allow to answer questions such as why to approve/deny mutation, how to prepare mutation, and how to evaluate mutation. A testbed demonstrating the technical doability of thing mutation along with the conducted experiments are also discussed in the paper.
KW - Cell
KW - Internet of Things
KW - Mutation
KW - Responsiveness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114792940&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.iot.2021.100400
DO - 10.1016/j.iot.2021.100400
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85114792940
SN - 2542-6605
VL - 14
JO - Internet of Things (Netherlands)
JF - Internet of Things (Netherlands)
M1 - 100400
ER -