Abstract

This paper argues that decolonial theory can offer a distinctive and valuable ethical lens. Decolonial perspectives give rise to an ethics that is fundamentally global but distinct from, and critical of, moral cosmopolitanism. Decolonial ethics shares with cosmopolitanism a refusal to circumscribe normative commitments on the basis of existing political and cultural boundaries. It differs from cosmopolitanism, though, by virtue of its rejection of the individualism and universalism of cosmopolitan thought. Where cosmopolitan approaches tend to articulate abstract principles developed from within a particular Western tradition, decolonial approaches reject abstract global designs in favour of inter-cultural dialogue amongst multiple people(s), including peoples who deem collective and non-human entities to be of fundamental moral importance. In addition, decolonial global ethics rejects universality in favour of ‘pluriversality’.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)380-397
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Global Ethics
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Sep 2017

Fingerprint

Cosmopolitanism
Global Ethics
Western Tradition
Universality
Individualism
Universalism
Rejection
Thought
Nonhuman
Intercultural Dialogue
Cultural Boundaries
Entity
Fundamental

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Global Ethics on 21/09/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17449626.2017.1373140

Keywords

  • Decolonial
  • Global Ethics
  • Cosmopolitanism
  • Pluriverse
  • Colonialism

Cite this

@article{232951a0767f49e388db9938a1a78fcf,
title = "Toward a decolonial global ethics",
abstract = "This paper argues that decolonial theory can offer a distinctive and valuable ethical lens. Decolonial perspectives give rise to an ethics that is fundamentally global but distinct from, and critical of, moral cosmopolitanism. Decolonial ethics shares with cosmopolitanism a refusal to circumscribe normative commitments on the basis of existing political and cultural boundaries. It differs from cosmopolitanism, though, by virtue of its rejection of the individualism and universalism of cosmopolitan thought. Where cosmopolitan approaches tend to articulate abstract principles developed from within a particular Western tradition, decolonial approaches reject abstract global designs in favour of inter-cultural dialogue amongst multiple people(s), including peoples who deem collective and non-human entities to be of fundamental moral importance. In addition, decolonial global ethics rejects universality in favour of ‘pluriversality’.",
keywords = "Decolonial, Global Ethics, Cosmopolitanism, Pluriverse, Colonialism",
author = "Robin Dunford",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Global Ethics on 21/09/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17449626.2017.1373140",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1080/17449626.2017.1373140",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "380--397",
journal = "Journal of Global Ethics",
issn = "1744-9626",
number = "3",

}

Toward a decolonial global ethics. / Dunford, Robin.

In: Journal of Global Ethics, Vol. 13, No. 3, 21.09.2017, p. 380-397.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward a decolonial global ethics

AU - Dunford, Robin

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Global Ethics on 21/09/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17449626.2017.1373140

PY - 2017/9/21

Y1 - 2017/9/21

N2 - This paper argues that decolonial theory can offer a distinctive and valuable ethical lens. Decolonial perspectives give rise to an ethics that is fundamentally global but distinct from, and critical of, moral cosmopolitanism. Decolonial ethics shares with cosmopolitanism a refusal to circumscribe normative commitments on the basis of existing political and cultural boundaries. It differs from cosmopolitanism, though, by virtue of its rejection of the individualism and universalism of cosmopolitan thought. Where cosmopolitan approaches tend to articulate abstract principles developed from within a particular Western tradition, decolonial approaches reject abstract global designs in favour of inter-cultural dialogue amongst multiple people(s), including peoples who deem collective and non-human entities to be of fundamental moral importance. In addition, decolonial global ethics rejects universality in favour of ‘pluriversality’.

AB - This paper argues that decolonial theory can offer a distinctive and valuable ethical lens. Decolonial perspectives give rise to an ethics that is fundamentally global but distinct from, and critical of, moral cosmopolitanism. Decolonial ethics shares with cosmopolitanism a refusal to circumscribe normative commitments on the basis of existing political and cultural boundaries. It differs from cosmopolitanism, though, by virtue of its rejection of the individualism and universalism of cosmopolitan thought. Where cosmopolitan approaches tend to articulate abstract principles developed from within a particular Western tradition, decolonial approaches reject abstract global designs in favour of inter-cultural dialogue amongst multiple people(s), including peoples who deem collective and non-human entities to be of fundamental moral importance. In addition, decolonial global ethics rejects universality in favour of ‘pluriversality’.

KW - Decolonial

KW - Global Ethics

KW - Cosmopolitanism

KW - Pluriverse

KW - Colonialism

U2 - 10.1080/17449626.2017.1373140

DO - 10.1080/17449626.2017.1373140

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 380

EP - 397

JO - Journal of Global Ethics

JF - Journal of Global Ethics

SN - 1744-9626

IS - 3

ER -