Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Theta burst stimulation in the rehabilitation of the upper limb: A semirandomized, placebo-controlled trial in chronic stroke patients

  • P. Talelli
  • , A. Wallace
  • , M. Dileone
  • , D. Hoad
  • , B. Cheeran
  • , R. Oliver
  • , M. Vandenbos
  • , U. Hammerbeck
  • , K. Barratt
  • , C. Gillini
  • , G. Musumeci
  • , M.-H. Boudrias
  • , G.C. Cloud
  • , J. Ball
  • , J.F. Marsden
  • , N.S. Ward
  • , V. Di Lazzaro
  • , R.G. Greenwood
  • , J.C. Rothwell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Background. Noninvasive cortical stimulation could represent an add-on treatment to enhance motor recovery after stroke. However, its clinical value, including anticipated size and duration of the treatment effects, remains largely unknown. Objective. The authors designed a small semi-randomized clinical trial to explore whether long-lasting clinically important gains can be achieved by adding theta burst stimulation (TBS), a form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), to a rehabilitation program for the hand.

    Methods. A total of 41 chronic stroke patients received excitatory TBS to the ipsilesional hemisphere or inhibitory TBS to the contralesional hemisphere in 2 centers; each active group was compared with a group receiving sham TBS. TBS was followed by physical therapy for 10 working days. Patients and therapists were blinded to the type of TBS. Primary outcome measures (9-hole Peg Test [9HPT], Jebsen Taylor Test [JTT], and grip and pinch-grip dynamometry) were assessed 4, 30, and 90 days post treatment. The clinically important difference was defined as 10% of the maximum score.

    Results. There were no differences between the active treatment and sham groups in any of the outcome measures. All patients achieved small sustainable improvements—9HPT, 5% of maximum (confidence interval [CI] = 3%-7%); JTT, 5.7% (CI = 3%-8%); and grip strength, 6% (CI = 2%-10%)—all below the defined clinically important level. Conclusions. Cortical stimulation did not augment the gains from a late rehabilitation program. The effect size anticipated by the authors was overestimated. These results can improve the design of future work on therapeutic uses of TMS.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)976-987
    Number of pages11
    JournalNeurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
    Volume26
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 12 Mar 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Theta burst stimulation in the rehabilitation of the upper limb: A semirandomized, placebo-controlled trial in chronic stroke patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this