There is no alibi in designing: Responsibility and dialogue in the design process

Thomas-Bernard Kenniff; Ben Sweeting

There is no alibi in designing: Responsibility and dialogue in the design process

Thomas-Bernard Kenniff, Ben Sweeting

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This paper explores a potential relation between architecture and ethics intrinsic to design processes when understood in terms of dialogue or conversation. We draw on separate but related research interests: one focused on the design process, especially the significance of drawing, and the other on the ethics of designing for the public realm, with reference to Bakhtinian dialogism. Our investigation concentrates on two aspects of the design process both of which can be thought of in terms of conversation – first, the relation between architect and Other, and second, the act of drawing. Through this, we support the idea that in design the ethical and the aesthetic cannot be meaningfully separated from one another. Instead, their relation must be understood as a dialogue in and of itself, as well as part of the dialogue between all participants in the design process.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1-8
Number of pages	8
Journal	Opticon1826
Volume	16
Issue number	1
Publication status	Published - 6 Jan 2014

Bibliographical note

© 2013 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

Access to Document

237-1209-1-PB.pdfFinal published version, 1.43 MBLicence: CC BY

https://student-journals.ucl.ac.uk/opticon/article/id/1037/Licence: CC BY

Ben Sweeting
- R.B.Sweetingbrighton.acuk
- School of Arch, Tech and Eng - Principal Lecturer
- Radical Methodologies (RaM) Research Excellence Group
Person: Academic

2 Oral presentation

Contingency and Autonomy in Designing Architecture
Sweeting, B. (Presenter)
10 Jul 2014
Activity: External talk or presentation › Oral presentation

File
There is no alibi in [designing]: Responsibility and dialogue in the design process
Sweeting, B. (Presenter) & Kenniff, T.-B. (Presenter)
12 Jul 2012
Activity: External talk or presentation › Oral presentation

Cite this

@article{716d9b34cc954b39a52f5023e2421070,

title = "There is no alibi in designing: Responsibility and dialogue in the design process",

abstract = "This paper explores a potential relation between architecture and ethics intrinsic to design processes when understood in terms of dialogue or conversation. We draw on separate but related research interests: one focused on the design process, especially the significance of drawing, and the other on the ethics of designing for the public realm, with reference to Bakhtinian dialogism. Our investigation concentrates on two aspects of the design process both of which can be thought of in terms of conversation – first, the relation between architect and Other, and second, the act of drawing. Through this, we support the idea that in design the ethical and the aesthetic cannot be meaningfully separated from one another. Instead, their relation must be understood as a dialogue in and of itself, as well as part of the dialogue between all participants in the design process.",

author = "Thomas-Bernard Kenniff and Ben Sweeting",

note = "{\textcopyright} 2013 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/",

year = "2014",

month = jan,

day = "6",

language = "English",

volume = "16",

pages = "1--8",

journal = "Opticon1826",

issn = "2049-8128",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - There is no alibi in designing

T2 - Responsibility and dialogue in the design process

AU - Kenniff, Thomas-Bernard

AU - Sweeting, Ben

N1 - © 2013 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

PY - 2014/1/6

Y1 - 2014/1/6

N2 - This paper explores a potential relation between architecture and ethics intrinsic to design processes when understood in terms of dialogue or conversation. We draw on separate but related research interests: one focused on the design process, especially the significance of drawing, and the other on the ethics of designing for the public realm, with reference to Bakhtinian dialogism. Our investigation concentrates on two aspects of the design process both of which can be thought of in terms of conversation – first, the relation between architect and Other, and second, the act of drawing. Through this, we support the idea that in design the ethical and the aesthetic cannot be meaningfully separated from one another. Instead, their relation must be understood as a dialogue in and of itself, as well as part of the dialogue between all participants in the design process.

AB - This paper explores a potential relation between architecture and ethics intrinsic to design processes when understood in terms of dialogue or conversation. We draw on separate but related research interests: one focused on the design process, especially the significance of drawing, and the other on the ethics of designing for the public realm, with reference to Bakhtinian dialogism. Our investigation concentrates on two aspects of the design process both of which can be thought of in terms of conversation – first, the relation between architect and Other, and second, the act of drawing. Through this, we support the idea that in design the ethical and the aesthetic cannot be meaningfully separated from one another. Instead, their relation must be understood as a dialogue in and of itself, as well as part of the dialogue between all participants in the design process.

M3 - Article

SN - 2049-8128

VL - 16

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Opticon1826

JF - Opticon1826

IS - 1

ER -

There is no alibi in designing: Responsibility and dialogue in the design process

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Profiles

Ben Sweeting

Activities

Contingency and Autonomy in Designing Architecture

There is no alibi in [designing]: Responsibility and dialogue in the design process

Cite this