The Role of Action Learning in Supporting Continuous Innovation in Small to Medium Sized Firms (SMEs)

Paul Levy, David Knowles, Mihael Junkar

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding with ISSN or ISBNConference contribution with ISSN or ISBNResearchpeer-review

Abstract

It has long been recognised that innovation is a key motor of economic change, as it stimulates intense forms of competition. In order to innovate, our research suggests that businesses need to be proactive, able to audit the environment to identify change and opportunity. They must be open to challenge, and prepared to experiment; but most of all learning is the key. Small businesses face particular obstacles whilst innovating on account of their size; these include a lack of time, funds, staff and expertise. Consequently, small businesses have a high propensity to failure. The records show that some 66% of businesses cease trading during the 3 to 10 year period. Successfully managing a business is a challenge that calls on a wide range of skills and knowledge (Levy et al 2004). For most business managers, it is the pooling of experience that generates the most useful knowledge and builds competence. Experience has demonstrated the value of bringing small numbers of businesses together in facilitated groups where, in a non-competitive environment, they gain the synergetic benefits arising from the sharing of their combined knowledge and experience. This paper presents early results from a research project aimed at assessing the impact of action learning on the innovative capability of small and medium sized firms. Teams of senior managers from non-competing sectors embarked on a one-year process of group-based learning, underpinned by the methods and approach of action learning. Each participant identified an innovation goal of critical importance to their organisation. In terms of continuous innovation this can involve goals directed at product, service and business process improvement. Operational improvements using inter-organisational action learning have been described and documented by Coghlan et al (2002). In this project, specific improvements in innovation management capability have been examined. Action learning ‘sets’ and targeted learning were employed to support the learning required to allow action towards the achievement of these goals (Levy and Knowles, 2003). The paper tests the proposition that Action Learning, supported by targeted learning, is an effective, time and cost efficient method for supporting technological product and process innovation. The paper argues that action learning develops innovation managers into "reflective practitioners". Reflective practice is a fundamental competence needed to enable effective innovation management (Pedler 1996) (Weinstein 1998). The paper reports that action learning set members found the process to be beneficial for supporting continuous innovation in their firms. The regular ‘touchpoint’ of the action learning process helped to create a continuity in thinking about innovation in their business. Indeed, the totality of meetings, when analysed identifies a process of continuous innovation of business thinking, business strategy and process. The paper will present the results of post-programme interviews with participants and highlight learning and best practice in the use of Action Learning as a method for supporting Continuous Innovation in SMEs. Areas for further research will also be discussed and emerging research questions highlighted.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCI Net
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2005
EventCI Net - Brighton, UK
Duration: 1 Sep 2005 → …

Conference

ConferenceCI Net
Period1/09/05 → …

Fingerprint

Continuous innovation
Small and medium-sized enterprises
Action learning
Innovation
Managers
Small business
Business process
Innovation management
Small and medium-sized firms
Business strategy
Service process
Continuity
Management capability
Reflective practice
Best practice
Expertise
Process improvement
Economic change
Pooling
Senior managers

Bibliographical note

© CINet 2005

Keywords

  • Action Learning
  • Innovation
  • Individual and organisational learning
  • Continuous improvement (CI)
  • CENTRIM

Cite this

@inproceedings{13382649ef0042f087a4df119ef27d67,
title = "The Role of Action Learning in Supporting Continuous Innovation in Small to Medium Sized Firms (SMEs)",
abstract = "It has long been recognised that innovation is a key motor of economic change, as it stimulates intense forms of competition. In order to innovate, our research suggests that businesses need to be proactive, able to audit the environment to identify change and opportunity. They must be open to challenge, and prepared to experiment; but most of all learning is the key. Small businesses face particular obstacles whilst innovating on account of their size; these include a lack of time, funds, staff and expertise. Consequently, small businesses have a high propensity to failure. The records show that some 66{\%} of businesses cease trading during the 3 to 10 year period. Successfully managing a business is a challenge that calls on a wide range of skills and knowledge (Levy et al 2004). For most business managers, it is the pooling of experience that generates the most useful knowledge and builds competence. Experience has demonstrated the value of bringing small numbers of businesses together in facilitated groups where, in a non-competitive environment, they gain the synergetic benefits arising from the sharing of their combined knowledge and experience. This paper presents early results from a research project aimed at assessing the impact of action learning on the innovative capability of small and medium sized firms. Teams of senior managers from non-competing sectors embarked on a one-year process of group-based learning, underpinned by the methods and approach of action learning. Each participant identified an innovation goal of critical importance to their organisation. In terms of continuous innovation this can involve goals directed at product, service and business process improvement. Operational improvements using inter-organisational action learning have been described and documented by Coghlan et al (2002). In this project, specific improvements in innovation management capability have been examined. Action learning ‘sets’ and targeted learning were employed to support the learning required to allow action towards the achievement of these goals (Levy and Knowles, 2003). The paper tests the proposition that Action Learning, supported by targeted learning, is an effective, time and cost efficient method for supporting technological product and process innovation. The paper argues that action learning develops innovation managers into {"}reflective practitioners{"}. Reflective practice is a fundamental competence needed to enable effective innovation management (Pedler 1996) (Weinstein 1998). The paper reports that action learning set members found the process to be beneficial for supporting continuous innovation in their firms. The regular ‘touchpoint’ of the action learning process helped to create a continuity in thinking about innovation in their business. Indeed, the totality of meetings, when analysed identifies a process of continuous innovation of business thinking, business strategy and process. The paper will present the results of post-programme interviews with participants and highlight learning and best practice in the use of Action Learning as a method for supporting Continuous Innovation in SMEs. Areas for further research will also be discussed and emerging research questions highlighted.",
keywords = "Action Learning, Innovation, Individual and organisational learning, Continuous improvement (CI), CENTRIM",
author = "Paul Levy and David Knowles and Mihael Junkar",
note = "{\circledC} CINet 2005",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
language = "English",
booktitle = "CI Net",

}

The Role of Action Learning in Supporting Continuous Innovation in Small to Medium Sized Firms (SMEs). / Levy, Paul; Knowles, David; Junkar, Mihael.

CI Net. 2005.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding with ISSN or ISBNConference contribution with ISSN or ISBNResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - The Role of Action Learning in Supporting Continuous Innovation in Small to Medium Sized Firms (SMEs)

AU - Levy, Paul

AU - Knowles, David

AU - Junkar, Mihael

N1 - © CINet 2005

PY - 2005/9

Y1 - 2005/9

N2 - It has long been recognised that innovation is a key motor of economic change, as it stimulates intense forms of competition. In order to innovate, our research suggests that businesses need to be proactive, able to audit the environment to identify change and opportunity. They must be open to challenge, and prepared to experiment; but most of all learning is the key. Small businesses face particular obstacles whilst innovating on account of their size; these include a lack of time, funds, staff and expertise. Consequently, small businesses have a high propensity to failure. The records show that some 66% of businesses cease trading during the 3 to 10 year period. Successfully managing a business is a challenge that calls on a wide range of skills and knowledge (Levy et al 2004). For most business managers, it is the pooling of experience that generates the most useful knowledge and builds competence. Experience has demonstrated the value of bringing small numbers of businesses together in facilitated groups where, in a non-competitive environment, they gain the synergetic benefits arising from the sharing of their combined knowledge and experience. This paper presents early results from a research project aimed at assessing the impact of action learning on the innovative capability of small and medium sized firms. Teams of senior managers from non-competing sectors embarked on a one-year process of group-based learning, underpinned by the methods and approach of action learning. Each participant identified an innovation goal of critical importance to their organisation. In terms of continuous innovation this can involve goals directed at product, service and business process improvement. Operational improvements using inter-organisational action learning have been described and documented by Coghlan et al (2002). In this project, specific improvements in innovation management capability have been examined. Action learning ‘sets’ and targeted learning were employed to support the learning required to allow action towards the achievement of these goals (Levy and Knowles, 2003). The paper tests the proposition that Action Learning, supported by targeted learning, is an effective, time and cost efficient method for supporting technological product and process innovation. The paper argues that action learning develops innovation managers into "reflective practitioners". Reflective practice is a fundamental competence needed to enable effective innovation management (Pedler 1996) (Weinstein 1998). The paper reports that action learning set members found the process to be beneficial for supporting continuous innovation in their firms. The regular ‘touchpoint’ of the action learning process helped to create a continuity in thinking about innovation in their business. Indeed, the totality of meetings, when analysed identifies a process of continuous innovation of business thinking, business strategy and process. The paper will present the results of post-programme interviews with participants and highlight learning and best practice in the use of Action Learning as a method for supporting Continuous Innovation in SMEs. Areas for further research will also be discussed and emerging research questions highlighted.

AB - It has long been recognised that innovation is a key motor of economic change, as it stimulates intense forms of competition. In order to innovate, our research suggests that businesses need to be proactive, able to audit the environment to identify change and opportunity. They must be open to challenge, and prepared to experiment; but most of all learning is the key. Small businesses face particular obstacles whilst innovating on account of their size; these include a lack of time, funds, staff and expertise. Consequently, small businesses have a high propensity to failure. The records show that some 66% of businesses cease trading during the 3 to 10 year period. Successfully managing a business is a challenge that calls on a wide range of skills and knowledge (Levy et al 2004). For most business managers, it is the pooling of experience that generates the most useful knowledge and builds competence. Experience has demonstrated the value of bringing small numbers of businesses together in facilitated groups where, in a non-competitive environment, they gain the synergetic benefits arising from the sharing of their combined knowledge and experience. This paper presents early results from a research project aimed at assessing the impact of action learning on the innovative capability of small and medium sized firms. Teams of senior managers from non-competing sectors embarked on a one-year process of group-based learning, underpinned by the methods and approach of action learning. Each participant identified an innovation goal of critical importance to their organisation. In terms of continuous innovation this can involve goals directed at product, service and business process improvement. Operational improvements using inter-organisational action learning have been described and documented by Coghlan et al (2002). In this project, specific improvements in innovation management capability have been examined. Action learning ‘sets’ and targeted learning were employed to support the learning required to allow action towards the achievement of these goals (Levy and Knowles, 2003). The paper tests the proposition that Action Learning, supported by targeted learning, is an effective, time and cost efficient method for supporting technological product and process innovation. The paper argues that action learning develops innovation managers into "reflective practitioners". Reflective practice is a fundamental competence needed to enable effective innovation management (Pedler 1996) (Weinstein 1998). The paper reports that action learning set members found the process to be beneficial for supporting continuous innovation in their firms. The regular ‘touchpoint’ of the action learning process helped to create a continuity in thinking about innovation in their business. Indeed, the totality of meetings, when analysed identifies a process of continuous innovation of business thinking, business strategy and process. The paper will present the results of post-programme interviews with participants and highlight learning and best practice in the use of Action Learning as a method for supporting Continuous Innovation in SMEs. Areas for further research will also be discussed and emerging research questions highlighted.

KW - Action Learning

KW - Innovation

KW - Individual and organisational learning

KW - Continuous improvement (CI)

KW - CENTRIM

M3 - Conference contribution with ISSN or ISBN

BT - CI Net

ER -