The Improper Politics of Representation

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Recent debates about representative democracy pose two key arguments. First, they contend that the represented do not pre-exist their articulation, putting in to question the notion that the represented have pre-constituted interests. Second, they contend that representative claims are wider ranging than is normally assumed. They may ‘…be formal and informal, electoral and non-electoral, national and trans-national and manifest in multiple guises and spaces.’ (Saward 2016: 246) These arguments demand a rethinking of how representative democracy is understood and justified. I contend that the constructivist turn inadequately accounts for the relationship between inequality and representation. Unlike classic critics of representative democracy constructivist theorists fail to think the intrinsic relation between property, the proper and representation. While they maintain an agonistic public sphere at the centre of democratic contestation and opinion formation, they underemphasise the disjuncture between democratic equality and representative politics. In short these attempts to radicalise representative democracy inadequately address the sedimented forms of inequality which structure representation. In section 1 I set out the main tenets of the constructivist turn. In section 2 I set out three objections to this account, recalling without vindicating the Marxist critique of representative democracy. Last, I distinguish democratic politics as improper from representative claim making.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Constructivist Turn in Political Representation
EditorsLisa Disch, Mathijs van de Sande, Nadia Urbinati
Place of PublicationEdinburgh
Pages224-238
Number of pages15
StateAccepted/In press - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

representative democracy
politics
opinion formation
critic
equality
Politics of Representation
Democracy
demand
Constructivist

Keywords

  • Demcoracy
  • Representation
  • Equality
  • Improper

Cite this

Devenney, M. (2019). The Improper Politics of Representation. In L. Disch, M. van de Sande, & N. Urbinati (Eds.), The Constructivist Turn in Political Representation (pp. 224-238). Edinburgh.
Devenney, Mark. / The Improper Politics of Representation. The Constructivist Turn in Political Representation. editor / Lisa Disch ; Mathijs van de Sande ; Nadia Urbinati. Edinburgh, 2019. pp. 224-238
@inbook{5dbd3efbe7e0481ab35f70ad3298d3b6,
title = "The Improper Politics of Representation",
abstract = "Recent debates about representative democracy pose two key arguments. First, they contend that the represented do not pre-exist their articulation, putting in to question the notion that the represented have pre-constituted interests. Second, they contend that representative claims are wider ranging than is normally assumed. They may ‘…be formal and informal, electoral and non-electoral, national and trans-national and manifest in multiple guises and spaces.’ (Saward 2016: 246) These arguments demand a rethinking of how representative democracy is understood and justified. I contend that the constructivist turn inadequately accounts for the relationship between inequality and representation. Unlike classic critics of representative democracy constructivist theorists fail to think the intrinsic relation between property, the proper and representation. While they maintain an agonistic public sphere at the centre of democratic contestation and opinion formation, they underemphasise the disjuncture between democratic equality and representative politics. In short these attempts to radicalise representative democracy inadequately address the sedimented forms of inequality which structure representation. In section 1 I set out the main tenets of the constructivist turn. In section 2 I set out three objections to this account, recalling without vindicating the Marxist critique of representative democracy. Last, I distinguish democratic politics as improper from representative claim making.",
keywords = "Demcoracy, Representation, Equality, Improper",
author = "Mark Devenney",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781474442602",
pages = "224--238",
editor = "Lisa Disch and {van de Sande}, Mathijs and Nadia Urbinati",
booktitle = "The Constructivist Turn in Political Representation",

}

Devenney, M 2019, The Improper Politics of Representation. in L Disch, M van de Sande & N Urbinati (eds), The Constructivist Turn in Political Representation. Edinburgh, pp. 224-238.

The Improper Politics of Representation. / Devenney, Mark.

The Constructivist Turn in Political Representation. ed. / Lisa Disch; Mathijs van de Sande; Nadia Urbinati. Edinburgh, 2019. p. 224-238.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Improper Politics of Representation

AU - Devenney,Mark

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Recent debates about representative democracy pose two key arguments. First, they contend that the represented do not pre-exist their articulation, putting in to question the notion that the represented have pre-constituted interests. Second, they contend that representative claims are wider ranging than is normally assumed. They may ‘…be formal and informal, electoral and non-electoral, national and trans-national and manifest in multiple guises and spaces.’ (Saward 2016: 246) These arguments demand a rethinking of how representative democracy is understood and justified. I contend that the constructivist turn inadequately accounts for the relationship between inequality and representation. Unlike classic critics of representative democracy constructivist theorists fail to think the intrinsic relation between property, the proper and representation. While they maintain an agonistic public sphere at the centre of democratic contestation and opinion formation, they underemphasise the disjuncture between democratic equality and representative politics. In short these attempts to radicalise representative democracy inadequately address the sedimented forms of inequality which structure representation. In section 1 I set out the main tenets of the constructivist turn. In section 2 I set out three objections to this account, recalling without vindicating the Marxist critique of representative democracy. Last, I distinguish democratic politics as improper from representative claim making.

AB - Recent debates about representative democracy pose two key arguments. First, they contend that the represented do not pre-exist their articulation, putting in to question the notion that the represented have pre-constituted interests. Second, they contend that representative claims are wider ranging than is normally assumed. They may ‘…be formal and informal, electoral and non-electoral, national and trans-national and manifest in multiple guises and spaces.’ (Saward 2016: 246) These arguments demand a rethinking of how representative democracy is understood and justified. I contend that the constructivist turn inadequately accounts for the relationship between inequality and representation. Unlike classic critics of representative democracy constructivist theorists fail to think the intrinsic relation between property, the proper and representation. While they maintain an agonistic public sphere at the centre of democratic contestation and opinion formation, they underemphasise the disjuncture between democratic equality and representative politics. In short these attempts to radicalise representative democracy inadequately address the sedimented forms of inequality which structure representation. In section 1 I set out the main tenets of the constructivist turn. In section 2 I set out three objections to this account, recalling without vindicating the Marxist critique of representative democracy. Last, I distinguish democratic politics as improper from representative claim making.

KW - Demcoracy

KW - Representation

KW - Equality

KW - Improper

UR - https://edinburghuniversitypress.com/book-the-constructivist-turn-in-political-representation-hb.html

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781474442602

SP - 224

EP - 238

BT - The Constructivist Turn in Political Representation

CY - Edinburgh

ER -

Devenney M. The Improper Politics of Representation. In Disch L, van de Sande M, Urbinati N, editors, The Constructivist Turn in Political Representation. Edinburgh. 2019. p. 224-238.