The family and neoliberalism: time to revive a critique

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

I argue that the family remains integral to neoliberal capitalism. First, I identify two tensions in the neoliberals’ advocacy of the traditional family: that the “family values” advocated run directly counter to the homo economicus of the “free market”; and the fact that the increasingly strident rhetoric of the family belies its decreasing popularity. The implications of these tensions for how we might think of the family, I then propose, suggest that earlier critiques are worth revisiting for what they have to say about the family – whether in biological or in social form – as a structure of ownership. Finally, I conclude with some embryonic thoughts about the ideological role of that state of affairs in shaping at once our understanding of ‘politics’ and our politics.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)157-167
Number of pages11
JournalEthics and Social Welfare
Volume6
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

neoliberalism
homo economicus
politics
popularity
time
capitalist society
rhetoric
market
Values

Bibliographical note

© 2012 Taylor & Francis

Keywords

  • capitalism
  • family
  • feminism
  • neoliberalism
  • ownership

Cite this

@article{cba9fef69cf74c909e741c252618f3d5,
title = "The family and neoliberalism: time to revive a critique",
abstract = "I argue that the family remains integral to neoliberal capitalism. First, I identify two tensions in the neoliberals’ advocacy of the traditional family: that the “family values” advocated run directly counter to the homo economicus of the “free market”; and the fact that the increasingly strident rhetoric of the family belies its decreasing popularity. The implications of these tensions for how we might think of the family, I then propose, suggest that earlier critiques are worth revisiting for what they have to say about the family – whether in biological or in social form – as a structure of ownership. Finally, I conclude with some embryonic thoughts about the ideological role of that state of affairs in shaping at once our understanding of ‘politics’ and our politics.",
keywords = "capitalism, family, feminism, neoliberalism, ownership",
author = "Bob Brecher",
note = "{\circledC} 2012 Taylor & Francis",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "157--167",
journal = "Ethics and Social Welfare",
issn = "1749-6535",
number = "2",

}

The family and neoliberalism: time to revive a critique. / Brecher, Bob.

In: Ethics and Social Welfare, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2012, p. 157-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The family and neoliberalism: time to revive a critique

AU - Brecher, Bob

N1 - © 2012 Taylor & Francis

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - I argue that the family remains integral to neoliberal capitalism. First, I identify two tensions in the neoliberals’ advocacy of the traditional family: that the “family values” advocated run directly counter to the homo economicus of the “free market”; and the fact that the increasingly strident rhetoric of the family belies its decreasing popularity. The implications of these tensions for how we might think of the family, I then propose, suggest that earlier critiques are worth revisiting for what they have to say about the family – whether in biological or in social form – as a structure of ownership. Finally, I conclude with some embryonic thoughts about the ideological role of that state of affairs in shaping at once our understanding of ‘politics’ and our politics.

AB - I argue that the family remains integral to neoliberal capitalism. First, I identify two tensions in the neoliberals’ advocacy of the traditional family: that the “family values” advocated run directly counter to the homo economicus of the “free market”; and the fact that the increasingly strident rhetoric of the family belies its decreasing popularity. The implications of these tensions for how we might think of the family, I then propose, suggest that earlier critiques are worth revisiting for what they have to say about the family – whether in biological or in social form – as a structure of ownership. Finally, I conclude with some embryonic thoughts about the ideological role of that state of affairs in shaping at once our understanding of ‘politics’ and our politics.

KW - capitalism

KW - family

KW - feminism

KW - neoliberalism

KW - ownership

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 157

EP - 167

JO - Ethics and Social Welfare

JF - Ethics and Social Welfare

SN - 1749-6535

IS - 2

ER -