Abstract
The effect of methyl-ρ-hydroxybenzoate, propyl-ρ-hydroxybenzoate, chlorbutol, chlorocresol, EDTA, benzalkonium chloride, chlorhexidine, phenylmercuric nitrate and phenylmercuric borate on mucociliary transport rate of the frog palate has been examined. Following a variable number of applications all these preservatives halted transport, the first three reversibly. However, applications of thiomersal (0·01%) were well tolerated. The frog palate possesses a ciliated epithelium protected by mucus, since some of our findings are at variance with those previously reported results where the protective effect of mucus was negligible in the in-vitro model (usually trachea) employed, it would appear that the contribution of mucus to effective mucociliary clearance should not be underestimated
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 156-159 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 31 Mar 1989 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of some preservatives used in nasal preparations on mucociliary clearance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver