Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Digital Backlash as Postdigital Myth and Entanglement

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding with ISSN or ISBN › Chapter › peer-review

Abstract

This chapter is an exercise in applying theory to the digital backlash. It takes the rhetorical and empirical notion of the digital backlash and applies a double methodological filter: Barthes’ work on myth and mythologies and Benjamin’s writing on technological reproduction, history, and progress. They are used to identify the contradictions and ambivalences at the heart of some versions of the digital backlash, which the backlash itself is designed to oppose. The chapter concludes with a call for recognition of the need for parity between the digital and other social realms in order to understand the indivisibility of digital and ‘non-digital’ entanglement in our postdigital context. It also proposes that with its simplifications and elusiveness, the digital backlash can be regarded as the dark side of the postdigital and thus as its preeminent myth.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication Postdigital Backlash: Between Reason and Feeling
EditorsIngrid Forsler, Mia Čarapina, Petar Jandrić
Place of PublicationCham
PublisherSpringer
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 1 Oct 2026

Publication series

NamePostdigital Science and Education

Bibliographical note

Not yet published

Keywords

  • digital backlash
  • postdigital
  • myth
  • entanglement
  • technology
  • Barthes
  • Benjamin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Digital Backlash as Postdigital Myth and Entanglement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this