The critical power concept has been applied to constant-load exhaustive exercise and recently validated for 3-min all-out exercise. OBJECTIVES: To test the application of critical power to a 3-min all-out isokinetic cycling exercise. DESIGN: Single-group, experimental, comparative design. METHOD: Nine participants performed a 3-min all-out isokinetic test and 4-5 constant-load exhaustive trials, at 60 and 100rpm, on an electrically-braked cycle. The linear P-t-1 relationship was modelled using a 2-parameter model (slope: critical power; intercept: Anaerobic Work Capacity). End power and accumulated work done above EP were calculated from the 3-min tests. RESULTS: No significant difference and a significant correlation was found between end power and critical power (60rpm: 259±40W vs. 245±38W, P>0.05; r=0.85, P<0.01; 100rpm: 227±57W vs. 212±44W, P>0.05; r=0.86, P<0.01). The Bias±95% limits of agreement were 14±42W at 60rpm and 15±57W at 100rpm. Work done above EP (60rpm: 14.7±3.0kJ; 100rpm: 17.3±3.1kJ) was not significantly different to the anaerobic work capacity (60rpm: 16.2±3.2kJ; 100rpm: 20.6±6.4kJ; P>0.05) but with only a significant correlation at 60rpm (r=-0.71, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The 2-parameter model underpinning the critical power construct can be applied to a 3-min all-out isokinetic test. End power does not differ and correlates with critical power. However, a further insight into levels of agreement leads to some scepticism concerning the use of the two variables interchangeably. The great intra-subject differences between work done above EP and the intercept of the P-t-1 relationship should also be considered.
|Number of pages||5|
|Journal||Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport|
|Publication status||Published - 1 Dec 2014|
- Power–time relationship