Abstract
The concept of ‘ street-level bureaucracy ’ was coined by Michael Lipsky (1980) as the
common denominator for what would become a scholarly theme. Since then his stress
on the relative autonomy of professionals has been complemented by the insight that
they are working in a micro-network of relations, in varying contexts. The conception
of ‘ governance ’ adds a particular aspect to this: the multi-dimensional character of a
policy system as a nested sequence of decisions. Combining these views casts a
different perspective on the ways street-level bureaucrats are held accountable.
In this article some axiomatic assumptions are drawn from the existing literature
on the theme of street-level bureaucracy and on the conception of governance. Acknowledging
variety, and arguing for contextualized research, this results in a rethinking
of the issue of accountability at the street level.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 279-299 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Public administration |
| Volume | 85 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2007 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver