Sovereignty between the Katechon and the Eschaton: Rethinking the Leviathan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper both rejects the reading of Hobbes’s Leviathan as a secularised katechon and rethinks anew the questions of sovereignty and politics in his thought. It does so by examining the eschatological character of his politico-theological understanding of the relation between the kingdom of the Leviathan and the kingdom of God. Indeed, through different contemporary readings of Hobbes’s theory of the State, this paper offers an insight into the concrete eschatology at operation in Hobbes’s thought and underscores its relevance for the understanding of government, biopolitics and sovereignty. This is achieved through two different, albeit interconnected undertakings, which in turn allow us to agree but also to go beyond Agamben’s claim that the State, in Hobbes, does not have a katechontic function. The first is an exposition of the a-teleological character of Hobbes’s eschatology and his metaphysics of motion. The second involves a consideration of the temporality and the nature of the relation between the a-historical world of reason and the historical world of faith that underpins Hobbes’s theory of the State. Contrary to the contemporary interpretations in which Hobbes’s eschatology is presented as future regarding, we will highlight the chronological coincidence between the historical time of faith and the a-historical time of the Leviathan, placing Hobbes within the political coordinates of Benjamin’s messianism. By bringing this eschatological perspective to the fore, not only will the reading of Hobbes’s theory of sovereignty that aligns him with liberalism be problematized, but also, an analysis of the resources that Hobbes offers to imagine a different form of politics will be developed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-127
Number of pages21
JournalTelos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary
Volume2019
Issue number187
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Leviathan
Eschatology
Sovereignty
Thomas Hobbes
Faith
Thought
Biopolitics
Messianism
Kingdom of God
Resources
Kingdom
Temporality
Exposition
Coincidence
Metaphysics
Liberalism
Government

Keywords

  • Modern Philosophy
  • Hobbes
  • Biopolitics
  • Sovereignty
  • Violence
  • Agamben
  • liberalism
  • political theology

Cite this

@article{cc3e89b13698458e848f5f0a95f47a41,
title = "Sovereignty between the Katechon and the Eschaton: Rethinking the Leviathan",
abstract = "This paper both rejects the reading of Hobbes’s Leviathan as a secularised katechon and rethinks anew the questions of sovereignty and politics in his thought. It does so by examining the eschatological character of his politico-theological understanding of the relation between the kingdom of the Leviathan and the kingdom of God. Indeed, through different contemporary readings of Hobbes’s theory of the State, this paper offers an insight into the concrete eschatology at operation in Hobbes’s thought and underscores its relevance for the understanding of government, biopolitics and sovereignty. This is achieved through two different, albeit interconnected undertakings, which in turn allow us to agree but also to go beyond Agamben’s claim that the State, in Hobbes, does not have a katechontic function. The first is an exposition of the a-teleological character of Hobbes’s eschatology and his metaphysics of motion. The second involves a consideration of the temporality and the nature of the relation between the a-historical world of reason and the historical world of faith that underpins Hobbes’s theory of the State. Contrary to the contemporary interpretations in which Hobbes’s eschatology is presented as future regarding, we will highlight the chronological coincidence between the historical time of faith and the a-historical time of the Leviathan, placing Hobbes within the political coordinates of Benjamin’s messianism. By bringing this eschatological perspective to the fore, not only will the reading of Hobbes’s theory of sovereignty that aligns him with liberalism be problematized, but also, an analysis of the resources that Hobbes offers to imagine a different form of politics will be developed.",
keywords = "Modern Philosophy, Hobbes, Biopolitics, Sovereignty, Violence, Agamben, liberalism, political theology",
author = "Melayna Lamb and Primera, {German Eduardo}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3817/0619187107",
language = "English",
volume = "2019",
pages = "107--127",
journal = "Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary",
issn = "0090-6514",
number = "187",

}

Sovereignty between the Katechon and the Eschaton : Rethinking the Leviathan. / Lamb, Melayna ; Primera , German Eduardo .

In: Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary , Vol. 2019, No. 187, 01.06.2019, p. 107-127.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sovereignty between the Katechon and the Eschaton

T2 - Rethinking the Leviathan

AU - Lamb, Melayna

AU - Primera , German Eduardo

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - This paper both rejects the reading of Hobbes’s Leviathan as a secularised katechon and rethinks anew the questions of sovereignty and politics in his thought. It does so by examining the eschatological character of his politico-theological understanding of the relation between the kingdom of the Leviathan and the kingdom of God. Indeed, through different contemporary readings of Hobbes’s theory of the State, this paper offers an insight into the concrete eschatology at operation in Hobbes’s thought and underscores its relevance for the understanding of government, biopolitics and sovereignty. This is achieved through two different, albeit interconnected undertakings, which in turn allow us to agree but also to go beyond Agamben’s claim that the State, in Hobbes, does not have a katechontic function. The first is an exposition of the a-teleological character of Hobbes’s eschatology and his metaphysics of motion. The second involves a consideration of the temporality and the nature of the relation between the a-historical world of reason and the historical world of faith that underpins Hobbes’s theory of the State. Contrary to the contemporary interpretations in which Hobbes’s eschatology is presented as future regarding, we will highlight the chronological coincidence between the historical time of faith and the a-historical time of the Leviathan, placing Hobbes within the political coordinates of Benjamin’s messianism. By bringing this eschatological perspective to the fore, not only will the reading of Hobbes’s theory of sovereignty that aligns him with liberalism be problematized, but also, an analysis of the resources that Hobbes offers to imagine a different form of politics will be developed.

AB - This paper both rejects the reading of Hobbes’s Leviathan as a secularised katechon and rethinks anew the questions of sovereignty and politics in his thought. It does so by examining the eschatological character of his politico-theological understanding of the relation between the kingdom of the Leviathan and the kingdom of God. Indeed, through different contemporary readings of Hobbes’s theory of the State, this paper offers an insight into the concrete eschatology at operation in Hobbes’s thought and underscores its relevance for the understanding of government, biopolitics and sovereignty. This is achieved through two different, albeit interconnected undertakings, which in turn allow us to agree but also to go beyond Agamben’s claim that the State, in Hobbes, does not have a katechontic function. The first is an exposition of the a-teleological character of Hobbes’s eschatology and his metaphysics of motion. The second involves a consideration of the temporality and the nature of the relation between the a-historical world of reason and the historical world of faith that underpins Hobbes’s theory of the State. Contrary to the contemporary interpretations in which Hobbes’s eschatology is presented as future regarding, we will highlight the chronological coincidence between the historical time of faith and the a-historical time of the Leviathan, placing Hobbes within the political coordinates of Benjamin’s messianism. By bringing this eschatological perspective to the fore, not only will the reading of Hobbes’s theory of sovereignty that aligns him with liberalism be problematized, but also, an analysis of the resources that Hobbes offers to imagine a different form of politics will be developed.

KW - Modern Philosophy

KW - Hobbes

KW - Biopolitics

KW - Sovereignty

KW - Violence

KW - Agamben

KW - liberalism

KW - political theology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067967066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3817/0619187107

DO - 10.3817/0619187107

M3 - Article

VL - 2019

SP - 107

EP - 127

JO - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary

JF - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary

SN - 0090-6514

IS - 187

ER -