Social citizenship and social psychology

Emma Anderson, Stephen Gibson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper outlines the concept of social citizenship, which was first theorised in the late 1940s alongside the creation of the UK welfare state, and concerns citizens’ rights to a basic income and standard of living. It suggests that social citizenship – particularly welfare provision – is a useful and important topic for social psychological research, albeit one that has been largely overlooked. We provide an overview of key developments in social citizenship, and consider the impact of 30-plus years of neoliberal governance in Western democracies, which has resulted in ongoing changes to how welfare rights and responsibilities are configured, such as policies that make social citizenship rights contingent on conduct. We outline social scientific work that examines these shifting ideas of citizenship, personhood, welfare and conditionality, and make the case for a discursive psychological approach, which we illustrate with a brief empirical example. We suggest that critical discursive social psychology is particularly well placed to examine how psychological assumptions are built into both policy and lay discourse, and how these can legitimate interventions designed to work on the conduct of the unemployed, such as therapeutic and behaviour change initiatives. Finally, we argue that psychology is faced with a choice: while there are opportunities for the discipline to contribute to the design and implementation of such initiatives, to do so requires accepting the basic values of the underpinning neoliberal agenda. Instead, it is vital to place these assumptions under the critical microscope and explore how they work to obscure structural disadvantage.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere12510
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalSocial & Personality Psychology Compass
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Jan 2020

Fingerprint

social psychology
citizenship
welfare
critical psychology
basic income
value
rights and responsibilities
standard of living
welfare state
psychology
governance
democracy
citizen
discourse

Bibliographical note

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Anderson, E, Gibson, S. Social citizenship and social psychology. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2020;e12510., which has been published in final form at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/spc3.12510. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.

Keywords

  • discursive psychology
  • citizenship
  • Neoliberalism
  • social citizenship
  • welfare

Cite this

@article{f71fba5f941e4c26b3c7e46774ba3f73,
title = "Social citizenship and social psychology",
abstract = "This paper outlines the concept of social citizenship, which was first theorised in the late 1940s alongside the creation of the UK welfare state, and concerns citizens’ rights to a basic income and standard of living. It suggests that social citizenship – particularly welfare provision – is a useful and important topic for social psychological research, albeit one that has been largely overlooked. We provide an overview of key developments in social citizenship, and consider the impact of 30-plus years of neoliberal governance in Western democracies, which has resulted in ongoing changes to how welfare rights and responsibilities are configured, such as policies that make social citizenship rights contingent on conduct. We outline social scientific work that examines these shifting ideas of citizenship, personhood, welfare and conditionality, and make the case for a discursive psychological approach, which we illustrate with a brief empirical example. We suggest that critical discursive social psychology is particularly well placed to examine how psychological assumptions are built into both policy and lay discourse, and how these can legitimate interventions designed to work on the conduct of the unemployed, such as therapeutic and behaviour change initiatives. Finally, we argue that psychology is faced with a choice: while there are opportunities for the discipline to contribute to the design and implementation of such initiatives, to do so requires accepting the basic values of the underpinning neoliberal agenda. Instead, it is vital to place these assumptions under the critical microscope and explore how they work to obscure structural disadvantage.",
keywords = "discursive psychology, citizenship, Neoliberalism, social citizenship, welfare",
author = "Emma Anderson and Stephen Gibson",
note = "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Anderson, E, Gibson, S. Social citizenship and social psychology. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2020;e12510., which has been published in final form at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/spc3.12510. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1111/spc3.12510",
language = "English",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Social & Personality Psychology Compass",
issn = "1751-9004",

}

Social citizenship and social psychology. / Anderson, Emma; Gibson, Stephen.

In: Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 13.01.2020, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social citizenship and social psychology

AU - Anderson, Emma

AU - Gibson, Stephen

N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Anderson, E, Gibson, S. Social citizenship and social psychology. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2020;e12510., which has been published in final form at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/spc3.12510. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.

PY - 2020/1/13

Y1 - 2020/1/13

N2 - This paper outlines the concept of social citizenship, which was first theorised in the late 1940s alongside the creation of the UK welfare state, and concerns citizens’ rights to a basic income and standard of living. It suggests that social citizenship – particularly welfare provision – is a useful and important topic for social psychological research, albeit one that has been largely overlooked. We provide an overview of key developments in social citizenship, and consider the impact of 30-plus years of neoliberal governance in Western democracies, which has resulted in ongoing changes to how welfare rights and responsibilities are configured, such as policies that make social citizenship rights contingent on conduct. We outline social scientific work that examines these shifting ideas of citizenship, personhood, welfare and conditionality, and make the case for a discursive psychological approach, which we illustrate with a brief empirical example. We suggest that critical discursive social psychology is particularly well placed to examine how psychological assumptions are built into both policy and lay discourse, and how these can legitimate interventions designed to work on the conduct of the unemployed, such as therapeutic and behaviour change initiatives. Finally, we argue that psychology is faced with a choice: while there are opportunities for the discipline to contribute to the design and implementation of such initiatives, to do so requires accepting the basic values of the underpinning neoliberal agenda. Instead, it is vital to place these assumptions under the critical microscope and explore how they work to obscure structural disadvantage.

AB - This paper outlines the concept of social citizenship, which was first theorised in the late 1940s alongside the creation of the UK welfare state, and concerns citizens’ rights to a basic income and standard of living. It suggests that social citizenship – particularly welfare provision – is a useful and important topic for social psychological research, albeit one that has been largely overlooked. We provide an overview of key developments in social citizenship, and consider the impact of 30-plus years of neoliberal governance in Western democracies, which has resulted in ongoing changes to how welfare rights and responsibilities are configured, such as policies that make social citizenship rights contingent on conduct. We outline social scientific work that examines these shifting ideas of citizenship, personhood, welfare and conditionality, and make the case for a discursive psychological approach, which we illustrate with a brief empirical example. We suggest that critical discursive social psychology is particularly well placed to examine how psychological assumptions are built into both policy and lay discourse, and how these can legitimate interventions designed to work on the conduct of the unemployed, such as therapeutic and behaviour change initiatives. Finally, we argue that psychology is faced with a choice: while there are opportunities for the discipline to contribute to the design and implementation of such initiatives, to do so requires accepting the basic values of the underpinning neoliberal agenda. Instead, it is vital to place these assumptions under the critical microscope and explore how they work to obscure structural disadvantage.

KW - discursive psychology

KW - citizenship

KW - Neoliberalism

KW - social citizenship

KW - welfare

U2 - 10.1111/spc3.12510

DO - 10.1111/spc3.12510

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Social & Personality Psychology Compass

JF - Social & Personality Psychology Compass

SN - 1751-9004

M1 - e12510

ER -