In recent years, Deirdre Wilson has articulated a view of procedural meaning that is, on the face of it, a long way from the one originally conceived. Rather than making inferential comprehension easier, the function of procedural expressions in a language is to activate a range of domain-specific procedures, among these, emotion reading. This paper explores how emotion reading, and emotions themselves, can be integrated within a relevance theoretic framework. It explores a diverse range of different views of emotions and attempts to synthesize a procedural account of emotions in a way that fits with the account of mental architecture presented by Wilson (2011) and the relationship between strong and weak showing and strong and weak meaningNN developed in Sperber and Wilson (2015). The account involves an exploration of not only the relationship between ostensive and non-ostensive communication, but also between propositional and non-propositional effects and the relationship between decoding and inference in the way we read the emotions of others.
|Title of host publication||Relevance|
|Subtitle of host publication||Pragmatics and Interpretation|
|Editors||Kate Scott, Billy Clark, Robyn Carston|
|Place of Publication||Cambridge|
|Publisher||Cambridge University Press|
|Number of pages||14|
|Publication status||Published - 20 Aug 2019|
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'Slave to the passions: Making emotions relevant'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- School of Humanities and Social Science - Principal Lecturer