Scandalous Artefacts: Visual and Analogical Practice between Architecture and Archaeology

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

If architecture is a design-centered discipline which proceeds by suggesting propositional constructions then, this thesis argues, archaeology also designs, but in the form of reconstructions. This thesis proposes that whilst practitioners of these disciplines generally purport to practice in future-facing mode (for architecture) and in past-facing-mode (for archaeology), elements of architecture and archaeology also resemble one another. This thesis speculates that some of these resemblances have remained explicit and revealed whilst others have become occluded with time, but that all such resemblances share homological similarities of interconnected disciplinary origin.
Available in the space between disciplines related through homology, is a logically underpinned, visually analogical practice. This interdisciplinary practice springs from Barbara Stafford’s notion of an “analogical universe” using the abductive logic of C. S. Peirce to rationally support it. Defined as “scandalous,” a term derived from Claude Lévi-Strauss, this practice which I term ‘propositional reconstruction’ defines my approach to design and historical analysis in this thesis.
The thesis is constructed across “sites of encounter,” through which my visually analogical practice is informed, consisting of historical analysis and design in the form of propositional reconstructions.
The prologue and epilogue describe the work of Raphael at Villa Madama, which, I argue, provides a historical model for practising between architecture and archaeology. Chapter 1. Reconstruction introduces the key aims, objectives, context and methodology of the thesis. Chapter 2. Discipline and 3. Undiscipline provide an overview of architecture and archaeology as design disciplines whose resemblances, they posit, are expressed through drawing practices. Chapter 4. Resemblance and Chapter 5. The Analogist unpick the logical systems which I argue underpin interdisciplinary practice. Chapter 6. London Stone Reconstructed describes my own visually analogical practice for working between architecture and archaeology while Chapter 7. Chimaera closes with a propositional reconstruction relating to London Stone described through interdisciplinary drawings.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationPhD Research Projects 2018
EditorsNina Vollenbroker
Place of PublicationLondon
Pages70-71
StatePublished - 20 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Archaeology
Artifact
Resemblance
Logic
Historical Analysis
Homological
Claude Lévi-Strauss
Homology
Methodology
Charles Sanders Peirce
Prolog
Epilogue
Chimera
Universe

Cite this

Zambelli, A. (2018). Scandalous Artefacts: Visual and Analogical Practice between Architecture and Archaeology. In N. Vollenbroker (Ed.), PhD Research Projects 2018 (pp. 70-71). London.
Zambelli, Alessandro. / Scandalous Artefacts : Visual and Analogical Practice between Architecture and Archaeology. PhD Research Projects 2018. editor / Nina Vollenbroker. London, 2018. pp. 70-71
@inbook{8b570530f8384295952e35e9376d9a2c,
title = "Scandalous Artefacts: Visual and Analogical Practice between Architecture and Archaeology",
abstract = "If architecture is a design-centered discipline which proceeds by suggesting propositional constructions then, this thesis argues, archaeology also designs, but in the form of reconstructions. This thesis proposes that whilst practitioners of these disciplines generally purport to practice in future-facing mode (for architecture) and in past-facing-mode (for archaeology), elements of architecture and archaeology also resemble one another. This thesis speculates that some of these resemblances have remained explicit and revealed whilst others have become occluded with time, but that all such resemblances share homological similarities of interconnected disciplinary origin.Available in the space between disciplines related through homology, is a logically underpinned, visually analogical practice. This interdisciplinary practice springs from Barbara Stafford’s notion of an “analogical universe” using the abductive logic of C. S. Peirce to rationally support it. Defined as “scandalous,” a term derived from Claude L\{'e}vi-Strauss, this practice which I term ‘propositional reconstruction’ defines my approach to design and historical analysis in this thesis.The thesis is constructed across “sites of encounter,” through which my visually analogical practice is informed, consisting of historical analysis and design in the form of propositional reconstructions. The prologue and epilogue describe the work of Raphael at Villa Madama, which, I argue, provides a historical model for practising between architecture and archaeology. Chapter 1. Reconstruction introduces the key aims, objectives, context and methodology of the thesis. Chapter 2. Discipline and 3. Undiscipline provide an overview of architecture and archaeology as design disciplines whose resemblances, they posit, are expressed through drawing practices. Chapter 4. Resemblance and Chapter 5. The Analogist unpick the logical systems which I argue underpin interdisciplinary practice. Chapter 6. London Stone Reconstructed describes my own visually analogical practice for working between architecture and archaeology while Chapter 7. Chimaera closes with a propositional reconstruction relating to London Stone described through interdisciplinary drawings.",
author = "Alessandro Zambelli",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "20",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780995481992",
pages = "70--71",
editor = "Nina Vollenbroker",
booktitle = "PhD Research Projects 2018",

}

Zambelli, A 2018, Scandalous Artefacts: Visual and Analogical Practice between Architecture and Archaeology. in N Vollenbroker (ed.), PhD Research Projects 2018. London, pp. 70-71.

Scandalous Artefacts : Visual and Analogical Practice between Architecture and Archaeology. / Zambelli, Alessandro.

PhD Research Projects 2018. ed. / Nina Vollenbroker. London, 2018. p. 70-71.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Scandalous Artefacts

T2 - Visual and Analogical Practice between Architecture and Archaeology

AU - Zambelli,Alessandro

PY - 2018/2/20

Y1 - 2018/2/20

N2 - If architecture is a design-centered discipline which proceeds by suggesting propositional constructions then, this thesis argues, archaeology also designs, but in the form of reconstructions. This thesis proposes that whilst practitioners of these disciplines generally purport to practice in future-facing mode (for architecture) and in past-facing-mode (for archaeology), elements of architecture and archaeology also resemble one another. This thesis speculates that some of these resemblances have remained explicit and revealed whilst others have become occluded with time, but that all such resemblances share homological similarities of interconnected disciplinary origin.Available in the space between disciplines related through homology, is a logically underpinned, visually analogical practice. This interdisciplinary practice springs from Barbara Stafford’s notion of an “analogical universe” using the abductive logic of C. S. Peirce to rationally support it. Defined as “scandalous,” a term derived from Claude Lévi-Strauss, this practice which I term ‘propositional reconstruction’ defines my approach to design and historical analysis in this thesis.The thesis is constructed across “sites of encounter,” through which my visually analogical practice is informed, consisting of historical analysis and design in the form of propositional reconstructions. The prologue and epilogue describe the work of Raphael at Villa Madama, which, I argue, provides a historical model for practising between architecture and archaeology. Chapter 1. Reconstruction introduces the key aims, objectives, context and methodology of the thesis. Chapter 2. Discipline and 3. Undiscipline provide an overview of architecture and archaeology as design disciplines whose resemblances, they posit, are expressed through drawing practices. Chapter 4. Resemblance and Chapter 5. The Analogist unpick the logical systems which I argue underpin interdisciplinary practice. Chapter 6. London Stone Reconstructed describes my own visually analogical practice for working between architecture and archaeology while Chapter 7. Chimaera closes with a propositional reconstruction relating to London Stone described through interdisciplinary drawings.

AB - If architecture is a design-centered discipline which proceeds by suggesting propositional constructions then, this thesis argues, archaeology also designs, but in the form of reconstructions. This thesis proposes that whilst practitioners of these disciplines generally purport to practice in future-facing mode (for architecture) and in past-facing-mode (for archaeology), elements of architecture and archaeology also resemble one another. This thesis speculates that some of these resemblances have remained explicit and revealed whilst others have become occluded with time, but that all such resemblances share homological similarities of interconnected disciplinary origin.Available in the space between disciplines related through homology, is a logically underpinned, visually analogical practice. This interdisciplinary practice springs from Barbara Stafford’s notion of an “analogical universe” using the abductive logic of C. S. Peirce to rationally support it. Defined as “scandalous,” a term derived from Claude Lévi-Strauss, this practice which I term ‘propositional reconstruction’ defines my approach to design and historical analysis in this thesis.The thesis is constructed across “sites of encounter,” through which my visually analogical practice is informed, consisting of historical analysis and design in the form of propositional reconstructions. The prologue and epilogue describe the work of Raphael at Villa Madama, which, I argue, provides a historical model for practising between architecture and archaeology. Chapter 1. Reconstruction introduces the key aims, objectives, context and methodology of the thesis. Chapter 2. Discipline and 3. Undiscipline provide an overview of architecture and archaeology as design disciplines whose resemblances, they posit, are expressed through drawing practices. Chapter 4. Resemblance and Chapter 5. The Analogist unpick the logical systems which I argue underpin interdisciplinary practice. Chapter 6. London Stone Reconstructed describes my own visually analogical practice for working between architecture and archaeology while Chapter 7. Chimaera closes with a propositional reconstruction relating to London Stone described through interdisciplinary drawings.

UR - https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bartlett/architecture/phd-research-projects-2018

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780995481992

SP - 70

EP - 71

BT - PhD Research Projects 2018

CY - London

ER -

Zambelli A. Scandalous Artefacts: Visual and Analogical Practice between Architecture and Archaeology. In Vollenbroker N, editor, PhD Research Projects 2018. London. 2018. p. 70-71.