Researcher development in universities: Origins and historical context

Asher Rospigliosi, Tom Bourner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


This article explores the origins of researcher development in British universities. Its principal aim is to provide a coherent, and reasonably succinct, account of the evolution and development of researcher development that is as consistent as possible with what is known about the development of the Western university, the history of the research doctorate and the emergence of the research university. The main conclusion is that the origins of researcher development in the modern university can be found in the philology of the early modern university, which in turn emerged from the accumulation of knowledge in Western Christendom from other places and other times. Other conclusions are that there was little researcher development in the medieval university, and that the ‘traditional’ model of researcher development, centred on the PhD, is much more recent than is commonly supposed, so that, from a long-term perspective, the ‘traditional model’ may be but one stage in its continuing development. The article also develops a model that locates researcher development within a series of intellectual contexts: from the research process itself, to the advancement of knowledge more generally, and, finally, to changes in conceptions of knowledge itself.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)206-222
Number of pages17
JournalLondon Review of Education
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019

Bibliographical note

© Copyright 2019 Rospigliosi and Bourner. This is an Open
Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted
use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.


  • Researcher development
  • Graduate employability
  • Research
  • knowledge economy


Dive into the research topics of 'Researcher development in universities: Origins and historical context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this