Reflections: studying organizational change leadership as a subfield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Organizational change scholars frequently engage with academic disciplines such as economics and sociology as well as fields of study such as leadership studies and human resource management studies. Whilst, there has been considerable interest in interrelationships between academic disciplines, interrelationships between management fields of study referred to here as subfields are rarely discussed. As the organization of subfields is significant to studying organizational change, I reflect upon my own learning and frustrations in studying organizational change leadership as a subfield. I suggest that the 1950s hopes for convergent management sciences may still influence thinking about fields and subfields. I highlight the confusing semantics of management subfields and offer quantification through co-citation analysis as one possible way forward. I candidly reflect upon the challenges researching a relevant practitioner orientated subfield raises and also the joy of crossing boundaries between fields. In conclusion, I use the metaphor of a bridge to convey my own learning about interrelationships between the fields of organizational change studies and leadership studies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Change Management
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Oct 2017

Fingerprint

organizational change
leadership
field of study
management
human resource management
frustration
quantification
learning
metaphor
sociology
semantics
organization
science
economics

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Change Management on 18/10/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14697017.2017.1387219

Keywords

  • Organizational change studies
  • leadership studies
  • subfield
  • academic discipline

Cite this

@article{87c1cb45c67d4d2586522223848173fa,
title = "Reflections: studying organizational change leadership as a subfield",
abstract = "Organizational change scholars frequently engage with academic disciplines such as economics and sociology as well as fields of study such as leadership studies and human resource management studies. Whilst, there has been considerable interest in interrelationships between academic disciplines, interrelationships between management fields of study referred to here as subfields are rarely discussed. As the organization of subfields is significant to studying organizational change, I reflect upon my own learning and frustrations in studying organizational change leadership as a subfield. I suggest that the 1950s hopes for convergent management sciences may still influence thinking about fields and subfields. I highlight the confusing semantics of management subfields and offer quantification through co-citation analysis as one possible way forward. I candidly reflect upon the challenges researching a relevant practitioner orientated subfield raises and also the joy of crossing boundaries between fields. In conclusion, I use the metaphor of a bridge to convey my own learning about interrelationships between the fields of organizational change studies and leadership studies.",
keywords = "Organizational change studies, leadership studies, subfield, academic discipline",
author = "Mark Hughes",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Change Management on 18/10/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14697017.2017.1387219",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1080/14697017.2017.1387219",
language = "English",
pages = "1--10",

}

Reflections: studying organizational change leadership as a subfield. / Hughes, Mark.

18.10.2017, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reflections: studying organizational change leadership as a subfield

AU - Hughes, Mark

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Change Management on 18/10/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14697017.2017.1387219

PY - 2017/10/18

Y1 - 2017/10/18

N2 - Organizational change scholars frequently engage with academic disciplines such as economics and sociology as well as fields of study such as leadership studies and human resource management studies. Whilst, there has been considerable interest in interrelationships between academic disciplines, interrelationships between management fields of study referred to here as subfields are rarely discussed. As the organization of subfields is significant to studying organizational change, I reflect upon my own learning and frustrations in studying organizational change leadership as a subfield. I suggest that the 1950s hopes for convergent management sciences may still influence thinking about fields and subfields. I highlight the confusing semantics of management subfields and offer quantification through co-citation analysis as one possible way forward. I candidly reflect upon the challenges researching a relevant practitioner orientated subfield raises and also the joy of crossing boundaries between fields. In conclusion, I use the metaphor of a bridge to convey my own learning about interrelationships between the fields of organizational change studies and leadership studies.

AB - Organizational change scholars frequently engage with academic disciplines such as economics and sociology as well as fields of study such as leadership studies and human resource management studies. Whilst, there has been considerable interest in interrelationships between academic disciplines, interrelationships between management fields of study referred to here as subfields are rarely discussed. As the organization of subfields is significant to studying organizational change, I reflect upon my own learning and frustrations in studying organizational change leadership as a subfield. I suggest that the 1950s hopes for convergent management sciences may still influence thinking about fields and subfields. I highlight the confusing semantics of management subfields and offer quantification through co-citation analysis as one possible way forward. I candidly reflect upon the challenges researching a relevant practitioner orientated subfield raises and also the joy of crossing boundaries between fields. In conclusion, I use the metaphor of a bridge to convey my own learning about interrelationships between the fields of organizational change studies and leadership studies.

KW - Organizational change studies

KW - leadership studies

KW - subfield

KW - academic discipline

U2 - 10.1080/14697017.2017.1387219

DO - 10.1080/14697017.2017.1387219

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 10

ER -