Abstract
Resource-Based Theory (RBT) has become an acceptable theory to describe the importance of resources and capabilities in generating high performance. Our literature review shows that there are two approaches to RBT: reductionistic and holistic. Adopting a reductionistic approach has led to an inconsistency in the findings about the relationship between RBT constructs (i.e. resources and capabilities), and their impact on performance. This paper proposes that a holistic approach to RBT has a greater power to explain the complex interrelationships between dynamic capabilities, firm’s resources and competitive strategies. Through a critical review on both views, this study highlights areas in which future research is needed for greater understanding of the co-impact of a firm’s internal factors and competitive strategies on performance.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 509-525 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Strategic Change |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 17 Nov 2015 |
Bibliographical note
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Rashidirad, M., Soltani, E. and Salimian, H. (2015), ‘Reductionistic’ and ‘Holistic’ Views of Resource-Based Theory: A Review of the Literature . Strat. Change, 24: 509–525, which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsc.2037/full. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '‘Reductionistic’ and ‘Holistic’ Views of Resource-Based Theory: A Review of the Literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Hamid Salimian
Person: Academic